Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 2;12(11):e0006932.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006932. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Geographic variation in dengue seroprevalence and force of infection in the urban paediatric population of Indonesia

Affiliations

Geographic variation in dengue seroprevalence and force of infection in the urban paediatric population of Indonesia

Clarence C Tam et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Understanding the heterogeneous nature of dengue transmission is important for prioritizing and guiding the implementation of prevention strategies. However, passive surveillance data in endemic countries are rarely adequately informative. We analyzed data from a cluster-sample, cross-sectional seroprevalence study in 1-18 year-olds to investigate geographic differences in dengue seroprevalence and force of infection in Indonesia. We used catalytic models to estimate the force of infection in each of the 30 randomly selected sub-districts. Based on these estimates, we determined the proportion of sub-districts expected to reach seroprevalence levels of 50%, 70% and 90% by year of age. We used population averaged generalized estimating equation models to investigate individual- and cluster-level determinants of dengue seropositivity. Dengue force of infection varied substantially across Indonesia, ranging from 4.3% to 30.0% between sub-districts. By age nine, 60% of sub-districts are expected to have a seroprevalence ≥70%, rising to 83% by age 11. Higher odds of seropositivity were associated with higher population density (OR = 1.54 per 10-fold rise in population density, 95% CI: 1.03-2.32) and with City (relative to Regency) administrative status (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.32-2.79). Our findings highlight the substantial variation in dengue endemicity within Indonesia and the importance of understanding spatial heterogeneity in dengue transmission intensity for optimal dengue prevention strategies including future implementation of dengue vaccination programmes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AFT and JN are employees of Sanofi Pasteur. SRH has been an investigator for clinical and epidemiological studies sponsored by Sanofi Pasteur, and has been remunerated accordingly. CCT and MO'D have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Observed (orange markers) and model-predicted (blue line) seroprevalence by year of age, based on an overall estimated force of infection, λ, of 14.0% per annum, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, among children aged 1 to 18 years in Indonesia, 2014.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Estimated cluster-specific annual forces of infection with associated 95% confidence intervals among children aged 1 to 18 years in Indonesia, 2014.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Observed (orange markers) and model-predicted (blue line) cluster-specific seroprevalence against estimated cluster-specific force of infection among children aged 1 to 18 years in Indonesia, 2014.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Proportion of clusters expected to reach seroprevalence levels of 50%, 70% and 90% by year of age, based on models with an age-constant force of infection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murray NEA, Quam MB, Wilder-Smith A. Epidemiology of dengue: past, present and future prospects. Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2013. [cited 2017 Jul 4];5:299–309. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990732 10.2147/CLEP.S34440 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, et al. Refining the Global Spatial Limits of Dengue Virus Transmission by Evidence-Based Consensus. Reithinger R, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2012. August 7 [cited 2017 Jul 3];6(8):e1760 Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001760 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Dengue Prevention and Control 2012–2020 [Internet]. [cited 2017 Aug 22]. Available from: www.who.int/neglected_diseases/en
    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature [Internet]. 2013. April 7 [cited 2017 Jul 4];496(7446):504–7. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature12060 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gubler DJ. Dengue, Urbanization and Globalization: The Unholy Trinity of the 21(st) Century. Trop Med Health [Internet]. 2011. December [cited 2017 Jul 4];39(4 Suppl):3–11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500131 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances