Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206284.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206284. eCollection 2018.

Osteopathic care for spinal complaints: A systematic literature review

Nick Verhaeghe  1   2 , Janne Schepers  1   3 , Patrick van Dun  4 , Lieven Annemans  1
Affiliations

Osteopathic care for spinal complaints: A systematic literature review

Nick Verhaeghe et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the literature examining the impact of osteopathic care for spinal complaints. The bibliographic databases Medline (Pubmed), Web of Science, Embase, and PEDro were searched. In addition, a number of grey literature sources were searched. Only randomized controlled trials conducted in high-income Western countries were considered. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts. Primary outcomes included 'pain' and 'functional status', while secondary outcomes included 'medication use' and 'health status'. It was examined if differences existed related to the treatment protocol and geography (European vs. US studies). Study quality was assessed using the risk of bias tool of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Nineteen studies were included and qualitatively synthesized. Nine studies were from the US, followed by Germany with seven studies. The majority of studies (n = 13) focused on low back pain. In general, mixed findings related to the impact of osteopathic care on primary and secondary outcomes were observed. For the primary outcomes, a clear distinction between US and European studies was found, in favor of the latter ones. Studies were characterized by substantial methodological differences in sample sizes, number of treatments, control groups, and follow-up. In conclusion, there is some evidence suggesting that osteopathic care may be effective for people suffering from spinal complaints. Further studies with larger study samples and assessment of long-term impact are required to further increase the evidence-based knowledge of the potential of osteopathic care for individuals suffering from spinal complaints.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Patrick van Dun is an osteopath.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of the study selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Golob AL, Wipf JE. Low back pain. Med Clin North Am. 2014; 98(3):405–28. 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(2):284–99. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gore M, Sadosky A, Stacey BR, Tai KS, Leslie D. The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37 (11):E668–77. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241e5de - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(6):968–74. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, et al. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(7):1309–15. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types