Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
- PMID: 30389105
- PMCID: PMC7528458
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.026
Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
Abstract
Objective: To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer, with a particular focus on stage IB and stage III disease.
Methods: Two retrospective cohort studies were conducted using The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program between 1988 and 2014. The stage IB cohort consisted of node-negative FIGO stage IB1 (tumor size <2 cm), IB2 (2-3.9 cm), and IB3 (≥4 cm) cervical cancer. The stage III cohort consisted of FIGO stage IIIA, IIIB, and stage IIIC1 (any pelvic nodal metastasis) cervical cancer. Multivariable analysis was performed for cause-specific survival based on cancer stage.
Results: In the stage IB cohort (n = 8909), stage IB1 tumors were more likely to be adenocarcinoma and low-grade compared to other the groups (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, stage IB2 disease was independently associated with a nearly two-fold increased risk of cervical cancer mortality compared to stage IB1 disease (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-2.41, P < 0.001). In the stage III cohort (n = 11,733), stage IIIC1 was independently associated with improved cause-specific survival compared to stage IIIB disease (adjusted-HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.74-0.85, P < 0.001). Survival of stage IIIC1 disease significantly differed based on T = stage, (5-year rates: 74.8% for T1, 58.7% for T2, and 39.3% for T3) with a 35.3% difference in absolute survival (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer is useful to distinguish survival groups; stage IB1 and stage IB2 disease have distinct characteristics and survival outcomes, while survival in stage IIIC1 varies depending on local tumor factors.
Keywords: 2018; Cervical cancer; FIGO; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Staging; Validation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;134(1):49-57. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003311. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31188324 Free PMC article.
-
Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 6. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 31325847
-
Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19714. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019714. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32311956 Free PMC article.
-
Stage migration and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer at Stage IIIC according to the 2018 FIGO staging system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;14:1460543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1460543. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39411135 Free PMC article. Review.
-
FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina.Semin Surg Oncol. 1994 Jan-Feb;10(1):31-46. doi: 10.1002/ssu.2980100107. Semin Surg Oncol. 1994. PMID: 8115784 Review.
Cited by
-
18F-FDG PET/CT Habitat Radiomics Predicts Outcome of Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy.Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Nov 4;2(6):e190218. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190218. eCollection 2020 Nov. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020. PMID: 33937845 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and Validation a Necroptosis-Related Prognostic Signature in Cervical Cancer.Reprod Sci. 2023 Jun;30(6):2003-2015. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01155-y. Epub 2022 Dec 28. Reprod Sci. 2023. PMID: 36576713
-
A cellular senescence-related genes model allows for prognosis and treatment stratification of cervical cancer: a bioinformatics analysis and external verification.Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Sep 27;15(18):9408-9425. doi: 10.18632/aging.204981. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Aging (Albany NY). 2023. PMID: 37768206 Free PMC article.
-
NAT10-mediated RNA acetylation enhances HNRNPUL1 mRNA stability to contribute cervical cancer progression.Int J Med Sci. 2023 Jun 26;20(8):1079-1090. doi: 10.7150/ijms.83828. eCollection 2023. Int J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37484809 Free PMC article.
-
Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri.J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e40. Epub 2018 Dec 28. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30740962 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R, Cancer of the cervix uteri, Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet 143 (2018) 22–36. - PubMed
-
- FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri, Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 125 (2014) 97–98. - PubMed
-
- Waggoner SE, Cervical cancer, Lancet 361 (2003) 2217–2225. - PubMed
-
- Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, Souhami L, Grigsby P, Gordon W Jr., Alberts DS, Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix, J. Clin. Oncol. 18 (2000) 1606–1613. - PubMed
-
- Singh AK, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, BA Siegel FDG -PET lymph node staging and survival of patients with FIGO stage IIIb cervical carcinoma, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 56 (2003) 489–493. - PubMed