Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jun;28(6):819-834.
doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1247-4. Epub 2018 Nov 3.

The effect of patients' feedback on treatment outcome in a child and adolescent psychiatric sample: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of patients' feedback on treatment outcome in a child and adolescent psychiatric sample: a randomized controlled trial

Rint K de Jong et al. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

The systematic use of feedback from patients on treatment progress and treatment satisfaction is a promising method to increase treatment effectiveness. The extent to which this also applies to the treatment of children with severe psychiatric problems is not clear. We conducted a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to study the effect of adding Feedback Informed Treatment (FIT) to care as usual in a child psychiatric sample. Quality of Life (QoL) was used as the primary outcome measure and symptom severity as the second. Fifty-one therapists from eight Autism Care Teams in a multi-center facility for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Karakter) participated and were cluster randomized to the FIT condition (n = 4 teams) or the Care as Usual (CAU) condition (n = 4 teams). Children aged 6-18 years, mainly with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and treated in one of the Autism Care Teams were allocated to the FIT condition (n = 86) or the CAU condition (n = 80). Results indicated that adding FIT leads to an increased QoL [F (2,165) = 3.16, p = 0.045]. No additional effects were observed for symptom severity decrease [F (2,158) = 0.19, p = 0.825]. No interaction with time was found for QoL nor symptom severity. Adding FIT in a child psychiatric setting may increase QoL, but does not appear to decrease symptom severity as compared with CAU. It is suggested that FIT positively changes parents' expectations. Results should be replicated in other child psychiatric samples and with an extended theoretical model.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; Child and adolescent psychiatry; Feedback informed treatment; Quality of Life; Randomized controlled trial; Symptom severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Estimated marginal means of the total score on the Kidscreen-27 at T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Estimated marginal means of the total score on the Y-OQ-30 at T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5

References

    1. Gondek D, Edbrooke-Childs J, Fink E, et al. Feedback from outcome measures and treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice: a systematic review. Adm Policy Ment Heal Ment Heal Serv Res. 2016;43:325–343. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knaup C, Koesters M, Schoefer D, et al. Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195:15–22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053967. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlier IVE, Meuldijk D, Van Vliet IM, et al. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:104–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01543.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambert MJ, Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy. 2011;48:72–79. doi: 10.1037/a0022238. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lutz W, De Jong K, Rubel J. Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: where are we and where do we want to go? Psychother Res. 2015;25:625–632. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1079661. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types