The Accuracy of Clinical Staging of Stage I-IIIa Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis Based on Individual Participant Data
- PMID: 30391190
- PMCID: PMC6435782
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.020
The Accuracy of Clinical Staging of Stage I-IIIa Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis Based on Individual Participant Data
Abstract
Background: Clinical staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) helps determine the prognosis and treatment of patients; few data exist on the accuracy of clinical staging and the impact on treatment and survival of patients. We assessed whether participant or trial characteristics were associated with clinical staging accuracy as well as impact on survival.
Methods: We used individual participant data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), supplied for a meta-analysis of preoperative chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) vs surgery alone (± radiotherapy) in NSCLC. We assessed agreement between clinical TNM (cTNM) stage at randomization and pathologic TNM (pTNM) stage, for participants in the control group.
Results: Results are based on 698 patients who received surgery alone (± radiotherapy) with data for cTNM and pTNM stage. Forty-six percent of cases were cTNM stage I, 23% were cTNM stage II, and 31% were cTNM stage IIIa. cTNM stage disagreed with pTNM stage in 48% of cases, with 34% clinically understaged and 14% clinically overstaged. Agreement was not associated with age (P = .12), sex (P = .62), histology (P = .82), staging method (P = .32), or year of randomization (P = .98). Poorer survival in understaged patients was explained by the underlying pTNM stage. Clinical staging failed to detect T4 disease in 10% of cases and misclassified nodal disease in 38%.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates suboptimal agreement between clinical and pathologic staging. Discrepancies between clinical and pathologic T and N staging could have led to different treatment decisions in 10% and 38% of cases, respectively. There is therefore a need for further research into improving staging accuracy for patients with stage I-IIIa NSCLC.
Keywords: meta-analysis; non-small cell lung cancer; staging.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Setting the Stage for Success in Lung Cancer: The Importance of Remembering Your (Guide)Lines.Chest. 2019 Mar;155(3):456-457. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.11.019. Chest. 2019. PMID: 30846061 No abstract available.
-
Lung cancer staging: accuracy is critical.J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(Suppl 9):S1322-S1324. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.18. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31245122 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Setting the Stage: Delay to Surgery May Upstage Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Chest. 2019 Sep;156(3):633-634. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.113. Chest. 2019. PMID: 31511156 No abstract available.
-
Response.Chest. 2019 Sep;156(3):634-635. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.05.006. Chest. 2019. PMID: 31511157 No abstract available.
References
-
- Brierley J.D., Gospodarowicz M.K., Wittekind C. 8th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; Oxford: 2016. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours.
-
- Lencioni R., Crocetti L., Cioni R. Response to radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary tumours: a prospective, intention-to-treat, multicentre clinical trial (the RAPTURE study) Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):621–628. - PubMed
-
- Cerfolio R.J., Bryant A.S., Ojha B., Eloubeidi M. Improving the inaccuracies of clinical staging of patients with NSCLC: a prospective trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(4):1207–1213. - PubMed
-
- Gilligan D., Nicolson M., Smith I. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: results of the MRC LU22/NVALT2/EORTC 08012 multicentre randomised trial and update of systematic review. Lancet. 2007;369(9577):1929–1937. - PubMed
