Age at last screening and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer in older, unvaccinated, HPV-negative women: a modelling study
- PMID: 30392810
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30536-9
Age at last screening and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer in older, unvaccinated, HPV-negative women: a modelling study
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 1569-78.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):e10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30924-0. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30614471 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: There is a paucity of empirical evidence to inform the age at which to stop cervical cancer screening. The recommended age to stop screening generally varies between age 50-70 years worldwide. However, cervical cancer incidence and mortality remain high in older women. We used a Markov model of cervical cancer screening to estimate the remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer at different ages and with different exit screening tests, with the aim of informing recommendations of the age at which to stop cervical cancer screening in developed countries.
Methods: For this modelling study, we developed a state transition (Markov) model of cervical cancer natural history and screening. We developed, calibrated, and validated our model using Canadian provincial registries and survey data. To simulate an age-structured population in the model, a new cohort of 236 564 women (one fifth of the population of Canadian women aged 20-24 years in 2012) entered the model every year and were successively modelled in parallel. Successive cohorts entered the model at age 10 years, creating an age-structured population of women aged 10-100 years. Women who had a total hysterectomy were excluded from the analyses. We calibrated our model to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cancer incidence with data from Statistics Canada, which compiles the data from 13 individual provincial registries. We chose a three-stage progressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia model to include differences in management and treatment decisions depending on lesion severity. We modelled infections with four high-risk HPV groups: HPV16 and HPV18; HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52, and HPV58; HPV35, HPV39, HPV51, HPV56, HPV59, HPV66, and HPV68; and a generic group of other potentially oncogenic HPVs. We estimated 5-year, 10-year, and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer for older, unvaccinated women who stopped screening at different ages and underwent different screening tests.
Findings: Cervical cancer incidence excluding women with hysterectomies underestimated the incidence of cervical cancer in women with a cervix by up to 71% in women aged 80-84 years. Our model predicted that women without HPV vaccination who have been never screened have a 1 in 45 (95% percentile interval 1 in 32 to 1 in 64) lifetime risk of cervical cancer. Perfect adherence (100% of women screened) to cytology screening every 3 years between the ages of 25 years and 69 years could reduce the lifetime risk of cervical cancer to 1 in 532 women (95% percentile interval 1 in 375 to 1 in 820) without HPV vaccination. Increasing the age at which women stopped cytology screening from 55 years to 75 years led to incremental decreases in cancer risk later in life. A 70-year old woman whose screening history was unknown had an average remaining lifetime risk of 1 in 588 (<1%; 95% percentile interval 1 in 451 to 1 in 873) if she stopped screening. Her remaining lifetime risk at age 70 years was reduced to 1 in 1206 (2·0 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 942 to 1 in 1748) if she had a negative cytology test, 1 in 6525 (12·9 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 3167 to 1 in 18 664) if she had a negative HPV test, and 1 in 9550 (18·1 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 4928 to 1 in 23 228) if she had a negative co-test for cytology and HPV.
Interpretation: Cervical cancer risk reductions might be achieved by screening with cytology up to age 75 years, although with diminishing returns. A negative exit oncogenic HPV test or negative HPV test plus cytology correlates with a low remaining lifetime cervical cancer risk for unvaccinated women with a cervix after the age of 55 years.
Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Evidence-based screening protocols for cervical cancer?Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1544-1545. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30587-4. Epub 2018 Nov 1. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30392808 No abstract available.
-
Limitations of simulation models for cervical cancer screening.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):e68. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30011-7. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30712801 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Limitations of simulation models for cervical cancer screening - Authors' reply.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):e69. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30012-9. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30712802 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The clinical utility of extended high-risk HPV genotyping in risk-stratifying women with L-SIL cytology: A retrospective study of 8726 cases.Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Jul;130(7):542-550. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22573. Epub 2022 Mar 21. Cancer Cytopathol. 2022. PMID: 35312217
-
Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e96-e107. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Lancet Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29253402
-
The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study.Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jan;4(1):e19-e27. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30183-X. Epub 2018 Oct 2. Lancet Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30291040
-
Are 20 human papillomavirus types causing cervical cancer?J Pathol. 2014 Dec;234(4):431-5. doi: 10.1002/path.4424. J Pathol. 2014. PMID: 25124771 Review.
-
Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 May. Report No.: 11-05157-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 May. Report No.: 11-05157-EF-1. PMID: 22553886 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Cervical Inspection With AAVI and Cryotherapy on HPV-Diagnosed Women in Windhoek, Namibia.Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241290041. doi: 10.1177/00469580241290041. Inquiry. 2024. PMID: 39679498 Free PMC article.
-
Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250479. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0479. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40072436 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and genotype distribution of HPV infection among women in Xiamen, China.Front Microbiol. 2023 May 30;14:1130226. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1130226. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37323886 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)-participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM-B model.Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):2023-2035. doi: 10.1111/hex.13346. Epub 2021 Sep 2. Health Expect. 2021. PMID: 34476875 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiology of cervical cancer in elderly women: Analysis of incidence, treatment, and survival using German registry data.Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):17284-17295. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6318. Epub 2023 Jul 5. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37403686 Free PMC article.