Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;3(3):195-203.
doi: 10.1037/sah0000089. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lung Cancer Stigma: The Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (LCSI)

Affiliations

Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lung Cancer Stigma: The Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (LCSI)

Heidi A Hamann et al. Stigma Health. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Among patients with lung cancer, stigma is associated with negative psychosocial and behavioral outcomes. There is a need to develop psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for stigma that incorporate perspectives of patients diagnosed with lung cancer. As part of our multi-phase process of measure development and validation, we report on scale formation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (LCSI).

Method: Building on previously reported concept elicitation (Phase I) work, Phase II of LCSI development involved item generation and refinement, informed by literature review, provider input, and patient (N=20) feedback. Phase III focused on initial psychometric scale evaluation in a unique sample of 231 lung cancer patients.

Results: Based on provider input and patient cognitive interviews, 49 items were included in a preliminary measure. In an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the 37 retained items, three factors emerged: Perceived Stigma, Internalized Stigma, and Constrained Disclosure. Internal consistency of the final, 25-item LCSI scale was high (Cronbach's alpha= 0.89) and the three subscales demonstrated good internal consistency. The test-retest correlation was high (r = 0.91), suggesting strong stability of measurement over time. There was good convergent validity between the LCSI and an existing measure of lung cancer stigma, the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS; r= 0.58, p< 0.001).

Discussion: In a multi-phase process, we have developed a reliable, multi-dimensional measure of lung cancer stigma, the Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (LCSI). Subsequent work will be conducted to establish further evidence of validity and clinically meaningful change.

Keywords: lung cancer; measurement; patient-reported outcome; psychometric; stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual model of lung cancer stigma. Reprinted from “Stigma among patients with lung cancer: A patient-reported measurement model,” by H. A. Hamann, J. S. Ostroff, E. G. Marks, D. E. Gerber, J. H. Schiller, and S. J. C. Lee, 2014, Psycho-Oncology, 23, pp. 81–92. Copyright 2014 by the John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission. See the online article for the color version of this figure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consort diagram of patient recruitment and enrollment (Reprinted with permission from Supportive Care in Cancer)

References

    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365(5):395–409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alberg AJ, Brock MV, Ford JG, Samet JM, Spivack SD. Epidemiology of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed.: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST Journal. 2013;143(Suppl. 5):e1S–29S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2345. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. 2016 Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/ac....
    1. Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen H, Jorm AF. The Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SSDS): Development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2010;19(4):243–254. doi: 10.1002/mpr.325. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E, Spertus J, Dudley RA, Wu A, Chuahan C, Cohen P, Goertz C. Methods for developing patient-reported outcome-based performance measures (PRO-PMs) Value Health. 2015;18(4):493–504. doi: 10.1016/j.val.2015.02.018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources