Mammography facilities serving vulnerable women have longer follow-up times
- PMID: 30394526
- PMCID: PMC6341204
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13083
Mammography facilities serving vulnerable women have longer follow-up times
Abstract
Objective: To investigate mammography facilities' follow-up times, population vulnerability, system-based processes, and association with cancer stage at diagnosis.
Data sources: Prospectively collected from San Francisco Mammography Registry (SFMR) 2005-2011, California Cancer Registry 2005-2012, SFMR facility survey 2012.
Study design: We examined time to biopsy for 17 750 abnormal mammogram results (BI-RADS 4/5), categorizing eight facilities as short or long follow-up based on proportion of mammograms with biopsy at 30 days. We examined facility population vulnerability (race/ethnicity, language, education), and system processes. Among women with a cancer diagnosis, we modeled odds of advanced-stage (≥IIb) cancer diagnosis by facility follow-up group.
Data extraction methods: Merged SFMR, Cancer Registry and facility survey data.
Principal findings: Facilities (N = 4) with short follow-up completed biopsies by 30 days for 82% of mammograms compared with 62% for facilities with long follow-up (N = 4) (P < 0.0001). All facilities serving high proportions of vulnerable women were long follow-up facilities. The long follow-up facilities had fewer radiologists, longer biopsy appointment wait times, and less communication directly with women. Having the index abnormal mammogram at a long follow-up facility was associated with higher adjusted odds of advanced-stage cancer (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.10-1.91).
Conclusions: Providing mammography facilities serving vulnerable women with appropriate resources may decrease disparities in abnormal mammogram follow-up and cancer diagnosis stage.
Keywords: abnormal mammogram; breast cancer; delay; facility characteristics; vulnerable populations.
© 2018 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Figures
References
-
- ACS . Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. 2016. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts.... Accessed March 3, 2018.
-
- Adams EK, Breen N, Joski PJ. Impact of the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program on mammography and pap test utilization among white, Hispanic, and African American women: 1996‐2000. Cancer. 2007;109(2 Suppl):348‐358. - PubMed
-
- Chang SW, Kerlikowske K, Napoles‐Springer A, Posner SF, Sickles EA, Perez‐Stable EJ. Racial differences in timeliness of follow‐up after abnormal screening mammography. Cancer. 1996;78(7):1395‐1402. - PubMed
-
- Chuang SC, Chen W, Hashibe M, Li G, Zhang ZF. Survival rates of invasive breast cancer among ethnic Chinese women born in East Asia and the United States. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7(2):221‐226. - PubMed
-
- Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Linden HM, Reisch LM, Ayanian JZ, Larson EB. Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care. 2005;43(2):141‐148. - PubMed
