Tests of alternative evolutionary models are needed to enhance our understanding of biological invasions

Abstract

Contents Summary 701 I. Introduction 701 II. Why we need an explicitly evolutionary perspective 702 III. A case study invasion experiment 702 IV. The way forward 703 V. Conclusions 705 Acknowledgements 706 References 706 SUMMARY: Comparing models of trait evolution might generate new insights into the role of evolutionary history in biological invasions. Assumptions underlying Darwin's naturalization conundrum suggest that close relatives are functionally similar. However, newer work is suggesting more complex relationships between phylogenetic and functional distance. We present an example in which communities of close relatives are functionally divergent in leaf traits and have greater invader biomass. Such an approach leads to new questions, such as: When might selection lead to divergence between close relatives? For example, a history of sympatry might correspond with divergence. We suggest that moving beyond a simplistic version of Darwin's naturalization conundrum as alternative hypotheses will lead to a more nuanced view on how evolution has shaped biological invasions.

Keywords: Brownian motion; Darwin's naturalization conundrum; Darwin's naturalization hypothesis; Ornstein-Uhlenbeck; biological invasion; evolution; macroevolution; phylogeny.