Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Apr;22(4):420-423.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0235. Epub 2018 Nov 3.

Assessing the Impact of a Novel Integrated Palliative Care and Medical Oncology Inpatient Service on Health Care Utilization before Hospice Enrollment

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Assessing the Impact of a Novel Integrated Palliative Care and Medical Oncology Inpatient Service on Health Care Utilization before Hospice Enrollment

Emily M Ray et al. J Palliat Med. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Evidence increasingly supports the integration of specialist palliative care (PC) into routine cancer care. A novel, fully integrated PC and medical oncology inpatient service was developed at Duke University Hospital in 2011.

Objective: To assess the impact of PC integration on health care utilization among hospitalized cancer patients before hospice enrollment.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Patients in the solid tumor inpatient unit who were discharged to hospice between September 1, 2009, and June 30, 2010 (pre-PC integration), and September 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012 (postintegration). Cohorts were compared on the following outcomes from their final hospitalization before hospice enrollment: intensive care unit days, invasive procedures, subspecialty consultations, radiographic studies, hospital length of stay, and use of chemotherapy or radiation. Cohort differences were examined with descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests.

Results: Two hundred ninety-six patients were included in the analysis (133 pre-PC integration; 163 post-PC integration). Patient characteristics were similar between cohorts. Health care utilization was relatively low in both groups, although 26% and 24% were receiving chemotherapy at the time of admission or during hospitalization in the pre- and post-PC integration cohorts, respectively, and 6.8% in each cohort spent time in an intensive care unit. We found no significant differences in utilization between cohorts.

Discussion: PC integration into an inpatient solid tumor service may not impact health care utilization during the final hospitalization before discharge to hospice. This likely reflects the greater benefits of integrating PC farther upstream from the terminal hospitalization, if one hopes to meaningfully impact utilization near the end of life.

Keywords: cancer patients; end-of-life care; health care utilization; hospice; oncology; palliative care in oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kelly RJ, Smith TJ: Delivering maximum clinical benefit at an affordable price: Engaging stakeholders in cancer care. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e112–8. - PubMed
    1. Ramchandran K, Von Roenn JH: Palliative care always. Oncology 2013;27:27. - PubMed
    1. Prigerson HG, Bao Y, Shah MA, et al.: Chemotherapy use, performance status, and quality of life at the end of life. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:778–784. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garrido MM, Prigerson HG, Bao Y, Maciejewski PK: Chemotherapy use in the months before death and estimated costs of care in the last week of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2016;51:875–881.e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langton JM, Blanch B, Drew AK, et al.: Retrospective studies of end-of-life resource utilization and costs in cancer care using health administrative data: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2014;28:1167–1196. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources