Understanding and exploiting prediction errors minimization within the brain in pharmacological treatments
- PMID: 30395877
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.10.019
Understanding and exploiting prediction errors minimization within the brain in pharmacological treatments
Abstract
The human brain can be conceptualized as an inference machine that actively predicts and explains its sensations and perceptions: it makes predictions through a probabilistic model. Such a model is continuously and implicitly updated by the computation and minimization of weighted prediction errors, as shown by numerous studies and experimental results. Nevertheless, such an algorithmic functioning of the brain has not been exploited in the neuropharmacological practice. In this manuscript, we show by theoretical analysis and model fitting of previously published data in two different contexts, how it is possible to increase the effectiveness of neuropharmacological and immunosuppressive drugs, through the modulation of the weighted prediction errors. Moreover, on the basis of the proposed model, we derive an optimized drug administration schedule able to increase the drug effectiveness of one order of magnitude, in psoriasis treatment. We make important testable predictions, evidencing the impact and the potential benefit of prediction errors modulation within the brain, in the pharmacotherapeutic practice. Finally, our results lead to a novel formal theory of implicit learning, and shed lights on the actual roles of classical conditioning and UCS revaluation in behavioral and pharmacological conditioning experiments. The potential practical implications of our results are many: the reduction of drugs side effects; the maximization of the therapeutic outcome; a more effective treatment for chronic pain, certain neuropsychiatric diseases, autoimmune diseases and allergic diseases.
Keywords: Drug effectiveness; Neural gain; Partial reinforcement; Prediction errors; Psychoneuroimmunology; UCS revaluation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Placebo Response is Driven by UCS Revaluation: Evidence, Neurophysiological Consequences and a Quantitative Model.Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 20;6:28991. doi: 10.1038/srep28991. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27436417 Free PMC article.
-
A System Computational Model of Implicit Emotional Learning.Front Comput Neurosci. 2016 Jun 14;10:54. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2016.00054. eCollection 2016. Front Comput Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27378898 Free PMC article.
-
How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Mar;26(3):635-44. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00509. Epub 2013 Oct 29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24168216
-
Dialogues on prediction errors.Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Jun 21. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008. PMID: 18567531 Review.
-
Adding prediction risk to the theory of reward learning.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 May;1104:135-46. doi: 10.1196/annals.1390.005. Epub 2007 Mar 7. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. PMID: 17344526 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources