3D organ models-Revolution in pharmacological research?
- PMID: 30395949
- PMCID: PMC7129286
- DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.002
3D organ models-Revolution in pharmacological research?
Abstract
3D organ models have gained increasing attention as novel preclinical test systems and alternatives to animal testing. Over the years, many excellent in vitro tissue models have been developed. In parallel, microfluidic organ-on-a-chip tissue cultures have gained increasing interest for their ability to house several organ models on a single device and interlink these within a human-like environment. In contrast to these advancements, the development of human disease models is still in its infancy. Although major advances have recently been made, efforts still need to be intensified. Human disease models have proven valuable for their ability to closely mimic disease patterns in vitro, permitting the study of pathophysiological features and new treatment options. Although animal studies remain the gold standard for preclinical testing, they have major drawbacks such as high cost and ongoing controversy over their predictive value for several human conditions. Moreover, there is growing political and social pressure to develop alternatives to animal models, clearly promoting the search for valid, cost-efficient and easy-to-handle systems lacking interspecies-related differences. In this review, we discuss the current state of the art regarding 3D organ as well as the opportunities, limitations and future implications of their use.
Keywords: 3D printing; Alternatives to animal testing; Excised human tissue; Organ model; Pharmacological testing in vitro; Tissue engineering.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Lung-on-a-chip: the future of respiratory disease models and pharmacological studies.Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020 Mar;40(2):213-230. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2019.1710458. Epub 2020 Jan 6. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020. PMID: 31906727 Review.
-
3D bioprinting of complex tissues in vitro: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.Arch Toxicol. 2022 Mar;96(3):691-710. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03212-y. Epub 2022 Jan 10. Arch Toxicol. 2022. PMID: 35006284 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Microfluidic Devices and Three Dimensional-Printing Strategies for in vitro Models of Bone.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1230:1-14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-36588-2_1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020. PMID: 32285361 Review.
-
Microengineered Organ-on-a-chip Platforms towards Personalized Medicine.Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(45):5354-5366. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190222143542. Curr Pharm Des. 2018. PMID: 30799783 Review.
-
Grafting of 3D Bioprinting to In Vitro Drug Screening: A Review.Adv Healthc Mater. 2020 Apr;9(7):e1901773. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201901773. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020. PMID: 32125787 Review.
Cited by
-
Tissue-Engineered Models of the Human Brain: State-of-the-Art Analysis and Challenges.J Funct Biomater. 2022 Sep 9;13(3):146. doi: 10.3390/jfb13030146. J Funct Biomater. 2022. PMID: 36135581 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research on Integrated 3D Printing of Microfluidic Chips.Micromachines (Basel). 2023 Jun 25;14(7):1302. doi: 10.3390/mi14071302. Micromachines (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37512613 Free PMC article.
-
3D-Cultured Vascular-Like Networks Enable Validation of Vascular Disruption Properties of Drugs In Vitro.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 13;10:888492. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.888492. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35769106 Free PMC article.
-
Public attitudes toward the use of human induced pluripotent stem cells: insights from an Italian adult population.Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;12:1491257. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1491257. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39568604 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Printable Biomaterials for Use in Neural Tissue Engineering: An In Vitro Characterization and In Vivo Biocompatibility Assessment.Polymers (Basel). 2024 May 17;16(10):1426. doi: 10.3390/polym16101426. Polymers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38794619 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pound P., Bracken M.B. Is animal research sufficiently evidence based to be a cornerstone of biomedical research? BMJ. 2014;348:g3387. - PubMed
-
- Perrin S. Preclinical research: make mouse studies work. Nature. 2014;507:423–425. - PubMed
-
- Couzin-Frankel J. When mice mislead. Science. 2013;342(922-923):925. - PubMed
-
- Gerber P.A., Buhren B.A., et al. The top skin-associated genes: a comparative analysis of human and mouse skin transcriptomes. Biol. Chem. 2014;395:577–591. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources