Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11401-11405.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721165115.

Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population

Affiliations

Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population

Mostafa Salari Rad et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Two primary goals of psychological science should be to understand what aspects of human psychology are universal and the way that context and culture produce variability. This requires that we take into account the importance of culture and context in the way that we write our papers and in the types of populations that we sample. However, most research published in our leading journals has relied on sampling WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) populations. One might expect that our scholarly work and editorial choices would by now reflect the knowledge that Western populations may not be representative of humans generally with respect to any given psychological phenomenon. However, as we show here, almost all research published by one of our leading journals, Psychological Science, relies on Western samples and uses these data in an unreflective way to make inferences about humans in general. To take us forward, we offer a set of concrete proposals for authors, journal editors, and reviewers that may lead to a psychological science that is more representative of the human condition.

Keywords: cognition; culture; diversity; methodology; psychological science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Proportion of samples with demographic information reported in samples used in all studies published in Psychological Science in 2014.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnett JJ. The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. Am Psychol. 2008;63:602–614. - PubMed
    1. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci. 2010;33:61–83, discussion 83–135. - PubMed
    1. Gaertner L, Sedikides C, Cai H, Brown JD. It’s not WEIRD, it’s WRONG: When Researchers Overlook uNderlying Genotypes, they will not detect universal processes. Behav Brain Sci. 2010;33:93–94. - PubMed
    1. Medin D, Ojalehto B, Marin A, Bang M. Systems of (non-)diversity. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:1–5.
    1. Nielsen M, Haun D, Kärtner J, Legare CH. The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017;162:31–38. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types