Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul-Aug;11(4):323-329.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1533. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

Efficacy of Caries Removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in Primary Molars: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study

Affiliations

Efficacy of Caries Removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in Primary Molars: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study

Attiguppe Prabhakar et al. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To compare and evaluate morphological changes and bacterial deposits in primary carious molars after caries excavation with Carie-Care, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and round tungsten carbide bur.

Materials and methods: Thirty human carious primary molars extracted for therapeutic reasons were sectioned mesiodistally. These sectioned samples were allocated into three groups (20 samples each): group I: Carie Care, group II: Er:YAG laser, and group III: round tungsten carbide bur. After caries excavation, all samples were processed and examined under conventional light microscope to examine for bacterial deposits. Representative samples from each group were processed and analyzed to examine the morphology of caries-excavated tissue by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The Er:YAG laser showed best results with no smear layer followed by chemomechanically excavated surfaces with Carie-Care. Amount of bacterial deposits was observed to be more in group I while least in group II (p-value < 0.001). Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test revealed that there was statistically significant difference among all the three groups.

Conclusion: Among the three different methods of caries excavation, Er:YAG laser was found to be more effective compared with Carie-Care and round tungsten carbide bur.

Clinical significance: Laser-induced caries excavation by Er:YAG laser and chemomechanical method of caries removal by Carie-Care can be considered as future of noninvasive pediatric and preventive dentistry.How to cite this article: Prabhakar A, Lokeshwari M, Naik SV, Yavagal C. Efficacy of Caries Removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in Primary Molars: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018;11(4):323-329.

Keywords: Carie-Care; Caries excavation; Carious primary molars; Erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser; Light microscopy; Round tungsten carbide bur; Scanning electron microscope..

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Representative histological section (40×) after treatment with Carie-Care showing slight amount of dentinal tubule destruction and less bacterial remnants in the cavity floor
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
Representative histological section (40×) after treatment with Er:YAG laser showing irregular cavity floor and infected layer almost completely removed with no destruction of dentinal tubules
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:
Representative histological section (40×) after treatment with round tungsten carbide bur showing smooth cavity floor, without irregularities and with marked dentinal tubule destruction
Figs 4A and B:
Figs 4A and B:
(A) Micrograph representative of specimen from group I (2,000×) showing irregularities on the cavity surface with minimally formed smear layer and few open dentinal tubules. (B) Micrograph representative of specimen from group I (5,000×) showing irregularities on the cavity surface with minimally formed smear layer and few open dentinal tubules
Figs 5A and B:
Figs 5A and B:
(A) Micrograph representative of specimen from group II (2,000×) showing irregular rugged appearance and no smear layer formation and opening of dentinal tubule orifices. (B) Micrograph representative of specimen from group II (5,000×) showing irregular rugged appearance and no smear layer formation and opening of dentinal tubule orifices
Figs 6A and B:
Figs 6A and B:
(A) Micrograph representative of specimen from group III (2,000×) showing rougher cavity floor with well-defined smear layer and occluded dentinal tubules. (B) Micrograph representative of specimen from group III (5,000×) showing rougher cavity floor with well-defined smear layer and occluded dentinal tubules
Graph 1:
Graph 1:
Intergroup comparison of number of bacterial counts after caries excavation in all the three groups
Graph 2:
Graph 2:
Distribution of scoring given to caries excavated dentin in all the three groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chowdhry S, Saha S, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Garg A, Chowdhry P. Recent vs conventional methods of caries removal: a comparative in vivo study in pediatric patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Jan-Apr;8(1):6–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yip HK, Samaranayake LP. Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 1998 Dec;2(4):148–154. - PubMed
    1. Celiberti P, Francescut P, Lussi A. Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth. Caries Res. 2006;40(2):117–123. - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Contreras-Bulnes R, Sakagami H, Morales-Luckie RA, Nakajima H. A comparative in vitro efficacy of conventional rotary and chemomechanical caries removal: Influence on cariogenic flora, microhardness, and residual composition. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Nov;17(6):536–540. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajakumar S, Mungara J, Joseph E, Philip J, Guptha V, Shilpa Pally MP. Evaluation of three different caries removal techniques in children: a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Fall;38(1):23–26. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources