Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Nov;39(11):1130-1138.
doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.11.23091.

Doctors' knowledge of the doses and risks of radiological investigations performed in the emergency department

Affiliations
Observational Study

Doctors' knowledge of the doses and risks of radiological investigations performed in the emergency department

Rashid A Barnawi et al. Saudi Med J. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess emergency doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure doses and risks, and the increasing use of radiological investigations in emergency medicine practice is very concerning because of the associated risks of cancer.

Methods: Doctors from different specialties and with different levels of training working in emergency departments of 8 hospitals in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, filled out a questionnaire. Participants estimated the radiation doses of different imaging modalities and answered questions regarding possible associated risks. Results: One hundred seventy-one doctors returned completed questionnaires. The overall correct dose estimation rate was 20.8%. Doses were more correctly estimated by consultants versus specialists and residents (p=0.007), and by emergency physicians versus doctors from other specialties (p=0.05). The correct answer rate was insignificantly higher among doctors with formal training on radiation protection (p=0.065). The overall correct answer rate was unsatisfactory for 4 questions assessing physicians' knowledge of risks. Questions about the lifetime risk of cancer due to ionizing radiation were more correctly answered by consultants versus residents and specialists (p=0.05). Specialists were more knowledgeable about the risk of imaging on fetuses (p=0.05). Doctors with formal training answered 3 out of 4 questions more correctly than doctors without formal training, but no difference existed between them regarding imaging modalities, that they selected for pregnant patients (p=0.297). Conclusion: Doctors working in emergency departments had poor knowledge about radiation doses and risks. This issue warrants urgent attention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The correct dose estimation rate by specialty.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correct answer rate for questions assessing knowledge of risks by level of training.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The correct answer rate for questions assessing knowledge of risks, based on whether physicians had or had not received formal training on radiation protection.

References

    1. Günalp M, Gülünay B, Polat O, Demirkan A, Gürler S, Akkaş M, et al. Ionising radiation awareness among resident doctors, interns, and radiographers in a university hospital emergency department. Radiol Med. 2014;119:440–447. - PubMed
    1. Keijzers GB, Britton CJ. Doctors'knowledge of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging requested in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2010;193:450–453. - PubMed
    1. Griffey RT, Jeffe DB, Bailey T. Emergency physicians'attitudes and preferences regarding computed tomography, radiation exposure, and imaging decision support. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:768–777. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsiridis E, Lusty PJ, Narvani AA, Tsapakis EM. Doctors'knowledge of exposure to ionising radiation:doctors'exposure to ionising radiation may be cause for concern. BMJ. 2003;327:1167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krille L, Hammer GP, Merzenich H, Zeeb H. Systematic review on physician's knowledge about radiation doses and radiation risks of computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:36–41. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms