Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 23:692:100-106.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 3.

Corticospinal excitability, assessed through stimulus response curves, is phase-, task-, and muscle-dependent during arm cycling

Affiliations

Corticospinal excitability, assessed through stimulus response curves, is phase-, task-, and muscle-dependent during arm cycling

Davis A Forman et al. Neurosci Lett. .

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii during arm cycling and an intensity-matched tonic contraction using stimulus response curves (SRCs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Corticospinal excitability was assessed using TMS elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) at eight different stimulation intensities (85-190% of MEP threshold). MEPs were recorded during arm cycling at two different positions, mid-elbow flexion (6 o'clock relative to a clock face) and mid-elbow extension (12 o'clock relative to a clock face), in addition to an intensity-matched (12 o'clock) tonic contraction. At the 12 o'clock position, the slope of the SRC was significantly lower during arm cycling than the tonic contraction for the biceps brachii (Cycling: 0.64 ± 0.47, Tonic: 1.02 ± 0.38, P < 0.05) but was not different for the triceps brachii (Cycling: 1.33 ± 0.49, Tonic: 1.48 ± 0.43, P = 0.42). Within arm cycling, the SRC slope was significantly greater at the 6 o'clock position than 12 o'clock position for the biceps brachii (6 o'clock: 1.37 ± 0.24, 12 o'clock: 0.64 ± 0.47, P < 0.05) but was not different for the triceps brachii (6 o'clock: 1.11 ± 0.28, 12 o'clock: 1.33 ± 0.49, P = 0.34). These findings demonstrate that corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii is task-dependent during the extension phase of arm cycling. Neither position nor task influenced corticospinal excitability to the triceps brachii, providing further support that the motor control of locomotor outputs is muscle-specific.

Keywords: Arm cranking; Arm cycling; Biceps brachii; MEP; Transcranial; Triceps brachii.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources