Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 6;20(11):e270.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.9366.

Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review

Affiliations

Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review

Amaryllis Mavragani et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: In the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. Google Trends is the most popular tool to gather such information, and it has been used in several topics up to this point, with health and medicine being the most focused subject. Web-based behavior is monitored and analyzed in order to examine actual human behavior so as to predict, better assess, and even prevent health-related issues that constantly arise in everyday life.

Objective: This systematic review aimed at reporting and further presenting and analyzing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches for Google Trends (infodemiology) studies in health-related topics from 2006 to 2016 to provide an overview of the usefulness of said tool and be a point of reference for future research on the subject.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for selecting studies, we searched for the term "Google Trends" in the Scopus and PubMed databases from 2006 to 2016, applying specific criteria for types of publications and topics. A total of 109 published papers were extracted, excluding duplicates and those that did not fall inside the topics of health and medicine or the selected article types. We then further categorized the published papers according to their methodological approach, namely, visualization, seasonality, correlations, forecasting, and modeling.

Results: All the examined papers comprised, by definition, time series analysis, and all but two included data visualization. A total of 23.1% (24/104) studies used Google Trends data for examining seasonality, while 39.4% (41/104) and 32.7% (34/104) of the studies used correlations and modeling, respectively. Only 8.7% (9/104) of the studies used Google Trends data for predictions and forecasting in health-related topics; therefore, it is evident that a gap exists in forecasting using Google Trends data.

Conclusions: The monitoring of online queries can provide insight into human behavior, as this field is significantly and continuously growing and will be proven more than valuable in the future for assessing behavioral changes and providing ground for research using data that could not have been accessed otherwise.

Keywords: Google Trends; big data; health assessment; infodemiology; medicine; review; statistical analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of the selection procedure for including studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Google Trends' publications per year in health-related fields from 2009 to 2016.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Countries by number of Scopus and PubMed publications using Google Trends.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The four steps toward employing Google Trends for health assessment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al Nuaimi E, Al Neyadi H, Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J. Applications of big data to smart cities. J Internet Serv Appl. 2015 Dec 1;6(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5. - DOI
    1. Hilbert M, López P. The world's technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science. 2011 Apr 01;332(6025):60–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1200970. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=21310967 science.1200970 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Philip Chen C, Zhang C. Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data. Information Sciences. 2014 Aug;275:314–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015. - DOI
    1. Jin X, Wah BW, Cheng X, Wang Y. Significance and Challenges of Big Data Research. Big Data Research. 2015 Jun;2(2):59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.006. - DOI
    1. Fosso Wamba S, Akter S, Edwards A, Chopin G, Gnanzou D. How ‘big data’ can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics. 2015 Jul;165:234–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031. - DOI

Publication types