Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;16(5):4265-4270.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6711. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Optimal sampling time-point for cyclosporin A concentration monitoring in heart transplant recipients

Affiliations

Optimal sampling time-point for cyclosporin A concentration monitoring in heart transplant recipients

Yixin Jia et al. Exp Ther Med. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

The present study was performed to determine an optimal time-point for monitoring the concentration of the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A (CsA) in heart transplant patients and its efficacy in the prevention of transplant rejection. A total of 32 transplant recipients were randomly assigned for three treatment approaches. Recipients in groups A (n=11), B (n=13) and C (n=8) received oral administration of CsA at doses of 3.2, 3.5 and 4.4 mg/kg, respectively. The plasma CsA concentrations were examined at 2 h intervals over 12 h. Furthermore, their correlation with the 4 h pharmacokinetic profiles as the area under the plasma CsA concentration vs. time curve (AUC0-4 h) were calculated The efficacy of CsA in inhibiting cardiac allograft rejection was assessed at 2 h after oral CsA intake (C2) and adverse events of the drug were examined in the C2-monitored recipients. The plasma CsA concentration rapidly increased in most recipients with a peak level detected at ~2 h after dosing. Regression analysis revealed that among all time-points assessed, the CsA had the highest correlation with the AUC0-4 h at C2. At C2, increasing CsA doses exhibited a positive association with the measure of AUC0-4 h. The efficacy of increasing CsA target levels at C2 in preventing heart transplant rejection was comparable, as the survival rate was 100% in all of the treatment groups. However, the proportion of recipients with side effects in group A was obviously lower than that in the other two groups. In conclusion, C2 is an ideal time-point for monitoring plasma CsA levels with a utility for individualising the next scheduled dose for each patient to ensure that target levels are maintained and achieve a high efficacy and safety of CsA therapy in heart transplant recipients (clinical trial no. 12002610).

Keywords: AUC0-4 h; CsA concentration at 2 h; correlation coefficient; cyclosporin A; heart transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pharmacokinetic profile of CsA. The pharmacokinetic profiles of individual recipients were observed by measuring the plasma CsA concentration every 2 h over a time period of 0–12 h. The mean values for CsA levels (ng/ml) were determined to generate CsA concentration-time curves. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=32). CsA, cyclosporin A.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Correlation between the plasma CsA concentration and the AUC0-4 h (ng/h/ml) at various time-points after administration (every 2 h over 12 h). (B) Correlation scatter plot for the AUC0-4 h vs. the CsA levels at C2 in heart transplant recipients (n=32). A positive correlation between the CsA levels at C2 and the AUC0-4 h was identified with an r2 value of 0.84 (P<0.05). AUC0-4 h, area under the curve of the plot of plasma CsA concentration against the time (0–4 h); CsA, cyclosporin A; C2, 2-h time-point after CsA administration.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Clinical efficacy and safety of CsA therapy. (A) The survival rate of heart transplant patients treated with CsA for preventing transplant rejection was 100% in all three groups, according to C2 monitoring. (B) The proportion of patients with adverse events (%) was obviously lower in group A compared with that in the other groups. *P<0.01 vs. groups A and B; #P<0.01 vs. group A. (C) The plasma creatinine levels were enhanced with increasing CsA concentrations at C2, with a positive correlation between the elevated creatinine content and the level of CsA at C2. CsA, cyclosporin A; C2, 2-h time-point after CsA administration.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burchill LJ. Heart transplantation in adult congenital heart disease. Heart. 2016;102:1871–1877. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korewicki J. Cardiac transplantation is still the method of choice in the treatment of patients with severe heart failure. Cardiol J. 2009;16:493–499. - PubMed
    1. Patel JK, Kittleson M, Kobashigawa JA. Cardiac allograft rejection. Surgeon. 2011;9:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel JK, Kobashigawa JA. Improving survival during heart transplantation: Diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and techniques for the prevention of graft injury. Future Cardiol. 2012;8:623–635. doi: 10.2217/fca.12.27. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ippoliti G, Rinaldi M, Pellegrini C, Viganò M. Incidence of cancer after immunosuppressive treatment for heart transplantation. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;56:101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.03.013. - DOI - PubMed