Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;51(5):338-343.
doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.5.338. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

The Effect of Saphenous Vein Ablation on Combined Segmental Popliteal Vein Reflux

Ki-Pyo Hong  1 , Do-Kyun Kim  1
Affiliations

The Effect of Saphenous Vein Ablation on Combined Segmental Popliteal Vein Reflux

Ki-Pyo Hong et al. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Background: This study examined the role of superficial vein surgery in patients with combined superficial venous reflux and segmental popliteal vein reflux.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 42 limbs in 38 patients with combined superficial venous reflux and segmental popliteal vein reflux who underwent saphenous vein ablation between January 2014 and February 2017. Patients underwent outpatient follow-up duplex ultrasonography at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Resolution of deep vein reflux was defined as reversed blood flow in a popliteal segment for less than 1.0 second and a decrease in the reflux time of more than 20% of the preoperative reflux time.

Results: The mean follow-up period was 9 months (range, 3-23 months). Saphenous vein ablations were performed by stripping in 24 limbs and radiofrequency ablation in 18 limbs. Preoperative segmental popliteal vein reflux resolved in 21 of the 42 limbs (50%).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that superficial venous surgery corrected segmental popliteal vein reflux in 50% of limbs with combined superficial venous reflux and segmental popliteal vein reflux. Other prospective studies are necessary to elucidate the etiology of the non-reversible cases.

Keywords: Duplex ultrasonography; Popliteal vein; Saphenous vein; Venous insufficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of perioperative VCSS score. VCSS, Venous Clinical Severity Score.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of perioperative AVVO score. AVVO, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scriven JM, Hartshorne T, Bell PR, Naylor AR, London NJ. Single-visit venous ulcer assessment clinic: the first year. Br J Surg. 1997;84:334–6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840319. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McEnroe CS, O’Donnell TF, Jr, Mackey WC. Correlation of clinical findings with venous hemodynamics in 386 patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Am J Surg. 1988;156:148–52. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80377-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Labropoulos N, Tassiopoulos AK, Kang SS, Mansour MA, Littooy FN, Baker WH. Prevalence of deep venous reflux in patients with primary superficial vein incompetence. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:663–8. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.110050. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walsh JC, Bergan JJ, Beeman S, Comer TP. Femoral venous reflux abolished by greater saphenous vein stripping. Ann Vasc Surg. 1994;8:566–70. doi: 10.1007/BF02017413. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sales CM, Bilof ML, Petrillo KA, Luka NL. Correction of lower extremity deep venous incompetence by ablation of superficial venous reflux. Ann Vasc Surg. 1996;10:186–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02000764. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources