Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 4:2018:3106056.
doi: 10.1155/2018/3106056. eCollection 2018.

Role of Tight Glycemic Control during Acute Coronary Syndrome on CV Outcome in Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Role of Tight Glycemic Control during Acute Coronary Syndrome on CV Outcome in Type 2 Diabetes

Ferdinando Carlo Sasso et al. J Diabetes Res. .

Abstract

Both incidence and mortality of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) among diabetic patients are much higher than those among nondiabetics. Actually, there are many studies that addressed glycemic control and CV risk, whilst the literature on the role of tight glycemic control during ACS is currently poor. Therefore, in this review, we critically discussed the studies that investigated this specific topic. Hyperglycemia is implicated in vascular damage and cardiac myocyte death through different molecular mechanisms as advanced glycation end products, protein kinase C, polyol pathway flux, and the hexosamine pathway. Moreover, high FFA concentrations may be toxic in acute ischemic myocardium due to several mechanisms, thus leading to endothelial dysfunction. A reduction in free fatty acid plasma levels and an increased availability of glucose can be achieved by using a glucose-insulin-potassium infusion (GIKi) during AMI. The GIKi is associated with an improvement of either long-term prognosis or left ventricular mechanical performance. DIGAMI studies suggested blood glucose level as a significant and independent mortality predictor among diabetic patients with recent ACS, enhancing the important role of glucose control in their management. Several mechanisms supporting the protective role of tight glycemic control during ACS, as well as position statements of Scientific Societies, were highlighted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schramm T. K., Gislason G. H., Køber L., et al. Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk: a population study of 3.3 million people. Circulation. 2008;117(15):1945–1954. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.720847. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lundberg V., Stegmayr B., Asplund K., Eliasson M., Huhtasaari F. Diabetes as a risk factor for myocardial infarction: population and gender perspectives. Journal of Internal Medicine. 1997;241(6):485–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1997.tb00006.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Advance Collaborative Group. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. NEJM. 2008;358(24):2560–2572. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0802987. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. NEJM. 2008;358(24):2545–2559. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0802743. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duckworth W., Abraira C., Moritz T., et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. NEJM. 2009;360(2):129–139. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms