Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: an Underestimated Risk Factor for the Development of Esophageal Cancer?-a Nationwide Survey
- PMID: 30402803
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3576-2
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: an Underestimated Risk Factor for the Development of Esophageal Cancer?-a Nationwide Survey
Abstract
Background: Approximately 14% of Austria's 8.5 million inhabitants have a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was introduced in Austria in 1994, where about 10.300 patients have received it so far. One of our LAGB patients developed an adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus 13 years after implantation.
Objectives: In order to calculate whether after LAGB patients are at higher risk for carcinoma of the esophagus, we performed a nationwide survey.
Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all surgical departments in Austria, primarily in order to detect cases with esophageal carcinoma after LAGB, but also to evaluate the policy in Austria concerning preoperative work-up, operation, and follow-up in LAGB patients.
Results: Since 1994, 37 of the 119 surgical departments in Austria have performed a total of about 10.300 LAGB implantations. Six patients have been identified with esophageal cancer following LAGB. The WHO statistical report on esophageal cancer shows an incidence of 2.8/100.000 per year in Austria, about 1/3 of which cases are adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus.
Conclusion: Following LAGB, the incidence of esophageal cancer might be up to fivefold higher than the aged standardized overall population of Austria.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Esophageal cancer; GERD; Gastric banding; Hiatal hernia; LAGB.
Similar articles
-
Long-Term (over 10 Years) Retrospective Follow-up of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding.Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):976-980. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2952-7. Obes Surg. 2018. PMID: 29159551
-
Major Esophageal Dilation After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in Symptomatic Patients: Does It Prevent Effective Weight Loss and How Should It be Treated?World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2000-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3036-2. World J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25804548
-
Large series examining laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding as a salvage solution for failed gastric bypass.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Dec;14(12):1869-1875. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018. PMID: 30309778
-
Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding - 8 years experience.Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):427-34. doi: 10.1381/096089203765887787. Obes Surg. 2003. PMID: 12841906
-
The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction.Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Sep;35 Suppl 3:S26-30. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.144. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011. PMID: 21912383 Review.
Cited by
-
Esophagogastric Neoplasms Following Bariatric Surgery: an Updated Systematic Review.Obes Surg. 2019 Aug;29(8):2660-2669. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03951-z. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 31129886
-
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis.Updates Surg. 2021 Apr;73(2):639-647. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00938-9. Epub 2021 Feb 19. Updates Surg. 2021. PMID: 33606148
-
Global trends in esophageal cancer and metabolic syndrome research: bibliometric analysis and visualization from 1995 to 2024.Discov Oncol. 2025 Mar 26;16(1):398. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02181-3. Discov Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40138022 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical