Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0206808.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206808. eCollection 2018.

The roles of preventive and curative health care in economic development

Affiliations

The roles of preventive and curative health care in economic development

Fuhmei Wang. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Both the preventive and curative healthcare provisions accumulate agents' health stock and stimulate economies' productivities. However, with limited medical resources, increases in preventive health expenditure crowd out curative expenditure, and vice versa, which in turn impairs the population's health and deters economic growth. This research aims to provide a empirically rigorous test on the hypothesis that optimally allocating health expenditure between prevention and cures stimulates economic growth within different countries, especially developed countries, and investigates whether health services are luxury goods on the path of economic development.

Methods: Based on OECD country experiences, this present study uses the system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation method to examine the roles of preventive and curative healthcare services over the path of economic development and proves that preventive and curative health spending have non-linear effects on economic performance.

Results: For growth maximization, the optimal share of preventive health expenditure to GDP is 0.44% with per capita GDP at US$40,465; the real share is 0.25% with per capita GDP at US$35,230. The optimal share of curative health expenditure to GDP is 10.96% with per capita GDP at US$41,816; the real share is 8.26% with per capita GDP at US$35,230. Accordingly, the estimated optimal provision of health services are currently underprovided. This research further estimates the effects of income on demand for care and shows that the income elasticities of preventive and curative health care are greater than unity. Health services are luxury goods.

Conclusions: Economies with higher incomes demand such services more than those with lower incomes. The large positive effects of income on preventive care use exist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author has declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The relationship between preventive health expenditure and economic performance.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The relationship between curative health expenditure and economic performance.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Engel curves for preventive and curative care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, Gutierrez RLM, O’Donnell M, Sullivan R, et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet 2015;385 (9967):549–62. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stanfield JP. The balance between preventive and curative Care. Trop Geogr Med 1993; 45 (5): 263–266. - PubMed
    1. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Edwards NM, Solberg LI. Greater use of preventive services in US health care could save lives at little or no cost. Health Affair 2010; 29(9): 1656–1660. - PubMed
    1. Russell LB. Prevention’s potential for slowing the growth of medical spending Washington, DC: National Coalition on Health Care, October 2007. (Accessed July 24, 2018, at http://www.nchc.org/nchc_report.pdf.) Idem.
    1. Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC. Does preventive care save money? Health economics and the presidential candidate. New Engl J of Med 2008; 358(7): 661–663. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms