Proximal Tibial Valgus Osteotomy: Lateral Closing Wedge
- PMID: 30405960
- PMCID: PMC6203491
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.N.00104
Proximal Tibial Valgus Osteotomy: Lateral Closing Wedge
Abstract
Valgus-producing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a well-accepted treatment modality in active patients with varus malalignment and symptomatic medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. One of the key factors for long-term success of the osteotomy is the achievement of an even distribution of the mechanical load on the knee joint by obtaining an ideal alignment of the lower-extremity mechanical axis. Proper surgical techniques are very important, and lateral closing wedge proximal tibial valgus osteotomy (CWO) is highly effective in achieving the desired overcorrection of 3° to 7° of valgus. The major steps of CWO are (1) preoperative planning, in which the frontal plane varus knee deformity is assessed on a standard whole-leg radiograph; (2) a transverse anterolateral incision from the tubercle toward the posterior aspect of the proximal part of the fibular head; (3) exposure and snaring of the common peroneal nerve; (4) resection of the anterior aspect of the proximal part of the fibular head; (5) use of a calibrated slotted wedge resection guide to perform the osteotomy proximal to the tuberosity under fluoroscopic guidance; (6) removal of an osseous wedge and closure of the osteotomy site, with the medial opposite cortex acting as a hinge; and (7) fixation of the osteotomy site with two step staples. Complications (e.g., nonunion, deep infection, and peroneal neuropathy) are rare. At follow-up, CWO has been shown to improve knee function and reduce pain. Male patients with early-onset knee OA have an almost ten times lower probability of failure of a CWO than women with more degenerative disease. The survival rate, with knee replacement as the end point, is approximately 75% at ten years following CWO. CWO postpones primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for a median of seven years, and there is low-quality evidence that osteotomy does not compromise subsequent knee replacement.
References
-
- Brouwer RW, Raaij van TM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhagen AP, Jakma TS, Verhaar JA. Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. December 13;12:CD004019. - PubMed
-
- van Raaij T, Reijman M, Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Verhaar JN. Survival of closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: good outcome in men with low-grade osteoarthritis after 10-16 years. Acta Orthop. 2008. April;79(2):230-4. - PubMed
-
- van Raaij TM, Brouwer RW, de Vlieger R, Reijman M, Verhaar JA. Opposite cortical fracture in high tibial osteotomy: lateral closing compared to the medial opening-wedge technique. Acta Orthop. 2008. August;79(4):508-14. - PubMed
-
- Duivenvoorden T, Brouwer RW, Baan A, Bos PK, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA. Comparison of closing-wedge and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial with a six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. September 3;96(17):1425-32. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources