Erosion Rate of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device Is Much Higher for Anal Incontinence than for Antireflux
- PMID: 30406579
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-4032-2
Erosion Rate of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device Is Much Higher for Anal Incontinence than for Antireflux
Comment on
-
Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device.J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Aug;22(8):1442-1447. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3775-0. Epub 2018 Apr 17. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018. PMID: 29667094
Similar articles
-
Long-term Experience of Magnetic Anal Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):87-95. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000709. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017. PMID: 27926562
-
Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation in patients with severe fecal incontinence.Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):109-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000263. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015. PMID: 25489702
-
A novel magnetic device to prevent fecal incontinence (preliminary study).Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 May;23(5):499-501. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0437-9. Epub 2008 Jan 30. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008. PMID: 18231796
-
The magnetic anal sphincter: a new device in the management of severe fecal incontinence.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 Sep;9(5):483-90. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.38. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012. PMID: 23116075 Review.
-
Fecal incontinence. Studies on physiology, pathophysiology and surgical treatment.Dan Med Bull. 2003 Aug;50(3):262-82. Dan Med Bull. 2003. PMID: 13677243 Review.
Cited by
-
Is magnetic anal sphincter augmentation still an option in fecal incontinence treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Mar 19;409(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03288-x. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 38499684
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources