Avoiding routine postoperative voiding cystourethrogram: Predicting radiologic success for endoscopically treated vesicoureteral reflux
- PMID: 30407152
- PMCID: PMC6520055
- DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5589
Avoiding routine postoperative voiding cystourethrogram: Predicting radiologic success for endoscopically treated vesicoureteral reflux
Abstract
Introduction: Variability in the success rates for the endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has prompted a debate regarding the use of routine postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). This study examines the predictive performance of intraoperative mound morphology (IMM) and the presence of a postoperative ultrasound mound (PUM) on radiologic success, as well as investigates the role of using these two predictive factors as a composite tool to predict VUR resolution after endoscopic treatment.
Methods: This retrospective study included children with primary VUR who underwent endoscopic correction with a double hydrodistension-implantation technique (HIT) and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer. IMM was assessed intraoperatively. The presence of a PUM and VUR resolution were assessed by postoperative ultrasound (US) and VCUG, respectively. Radiologic success was defined as VUR resolution.
Results: A total of 70 children (97 ureters) were included in the study. The overall radiologic success rate was 83.5%. There was no statistically significant association between radiologic success and IMM (85.2% with excellent and 87.5% with "other" morphology; p=0.81). The sensitivity and specificity of PUM for radiologic success in this study was 98% and 71%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the combined prediction model were 81.9% and 85.7%, respectively.
Conclusions: We objectively demonstrated that IMM was a poor predictor of radiologic success and should be used with caution. In addition, the performance of a combined prediction model was inferior to the presence of a PUM alone. As such, selective use of postoperative VCUG may be guided solely by the presence of a PUM.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Is routine voiding cystourethrogram necessary following double hit for primary vesicoureteral reflux?J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Feb;11(1):40.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Jan 30. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25725613
-
VUR timing on VCUG as a predictive factor of VUR resolution after endoscopic therapy.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):255.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 6. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 27220472
-
Long-term ultrasound appearance of concomitant autologous blood and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer implants: is it associated with successful correction of vesicoureteral reflux?Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.006. Urology. 2013. PMID: 23374819
-
Presence of dextranomer-hyaluronic acid (DxHA) mound on postoperative ultrasound does not predict resolution of vesicoureteral reflux.J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Aug;7(4):438-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Jun 17. J Pediatr Urol. 2011. PMID: 21672652
-
Factors affecting the success of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux and comparison of two dextranomer based bulking agents: does bulking substance matter?J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):90.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Mar 2. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25791422
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous