Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Nov;97(45):e13119.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013119.

The effects of a forced-air warming system plus electric blanket for elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effects of a forced-air warming system plus electric blanket for elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: A randomized controlled trial

Rui Zhang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Perioperative inadvertent hypothermia in elderly urology patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a well-known serious complication, as it increases the risk of myocardial ischemia, blood loss, and surgical wound infection. We conducted this prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the combined effect of a forced-air warming system and electric blanket in elderly TURP patients.

Methods: Between January 2015 and October 2017, we recruited 443 elderly male patients undergoing elective TURP with subarachnoid blockade (SAB). These were randomly divided into 3 groups: group E (intraoperative warming using electric blankets set to 38°C; n = 128); group F (intraoperative warming using a forced-air warmer set to 38°C; n = 155) and group FE (intraoperative warming using a forced-air warmer plus electric blankets, both set to 38°C; n = 160). The primary outcome was shivering and their grades. Hemodynamic changes, esophageal temperature, recovery time, incidences of adverse effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction were also recorded.

Results: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences when compared across the 3 groups (P >.05). Compared with groups E and F, both HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in group FE were significantly decreased from T6 to T10 (P <.05). Compared with groups E and F, esophageal temperature in group FE increased significantly from T5 to T10 (P <.05). Compared with group E, esophageal temperature in group F was significantly increased from T5 to T10 (P <.05). Compared with groups F and FE, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time was longer in group E, while compared with group F, PACU recovery time was shorter in group FE (P <.05). Compared to patients in groups E and F, those in group FE had a significantly lower incidence of arrhythmia and shivering (P <.05). The number of patients with shivering grades 0 to 3 was higher in group E than in other groups, while the number of patients with shivering grade 2 was significantly higher in group F than in group FE (P <.05). Patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were higher in group FE than in groups E and F (P <.05).

Conclusions: Use of a forced-air warming system combined with an electric blanket was an effective method with which to retain warmth among elderly TURP patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram depicting patient enrolment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hemodynamic data for the 3 groups of patients at various timepoints: arrival in the operating room (T0), just before the induction of anesthesia (T1), at the beginning of the operation (T2), 10 minutes (T3), 20 minutes (T4), 30 minutes (T5), 60 minutes after the onset of operation (T6), at the end of operation (T7), and 10 minutes (T8), 20 minutes (T9), and 30 minutes (T10) after arriving in the PACU. ∗P <.05 versus Group E.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Esophageal temperature data for the 3 groups of patients at various timepoints: arrival in the operating room (T0), just before anesthesia induction (T1), at the beginning of the operation (T2), 10 minutes (T3), 20 minutes (T4), 30 minutes (T5), 60 minutes after the onset of operation (T6), at the end of operation (T7), and 10 minutes (T8), 20 minutes (T9), and 30 minutes (T10) after arriving in the PACU. P <.05 versus Group E, #P <.05 versus Group F.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. John M, Crook D, Dasari K, et al. Comparison of resistive heating and forced-air warming to prevent inadvertentperioperative hypothermia. Br J Anaesth 2016;116:249–54. - PubMed
    1. Allen TK, Habib AS. Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia induced by spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery might be more significant than wethink: are we doing enough to warm our parturients. Anesth Analg 2018;126:7–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grigore AM, Murray CF, Ramakrishna H, et al. A core review of temperature regimens and neuro protection during cardiopulmonary bypass: does rewarming rate matter. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1741–51. - PubMed
    1. Shaw CA, Steelman VM, DeBerg J, et al. Effectiveness of active and passive warming for the prevention of inadvertent hypothermia in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth 2017;38:93–104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell G, Alderson P, Smith AF, et al. Warming of intravenous and irrigation fluids for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;4:CD009891. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms