Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;117(4):149-155.

Health Care Barriers to Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Wisconsin

Affiliations

Health Care Barriers to Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Wisconsin

Emily M Olson et al. WMJ. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), specifically implants and intrauterine devices (IUD), are highly effective, low maintenance forms of birth control. Practice guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that LARC be considered first-line birth control for most women; however, uptake remains low. In this study, we sought to understand practices and barriers to provision of LARC in routine and immediate postpartum settings as they differ between specialties.

Methods: We surveyed 3,000 Wisconsin physicians and advanced-practice providers in obstetrics-gynecology/women's health (Ob-gyn), family medicine, pediatrics, and midwifery to assess practices and barriers (56.5% response rate). This analysis is comprised of contraceptive care providers (n=992); statistical significance was tested using chi-square and 2-sample proportions tests.

Results: More providers working Ob-gyn (94.3%) and midwifery (78.7%) were skilled providers of LARC methods than those in family medicine (42.5%) and pediatrics (6.6%) (P < .0001). Lack of insertion skill was the most-cited barrier to routine provision among family medicine (31.1%) and pediatric (72.1%) providers. Among prenatal/delivery providers, over 50% across all specialties reported lack of device availability on-site as a barrier to immediate postpartum LARC provision; organizational practices also were commonly reported barriers.

Conclusions: Gaps in routine and immediate postpartum LARC practice were strongly related to specialty, and providers' experience heightened barriers to immediate postpartum compared to routine insertion. Skills training targeting family medicine and pediatric providers would enable broader access to LARC. Organizational barriers to immediate postpartum LARC provision impact many providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Survey Flow Diagram Abbreviations: Ob-gyn, obstetrics and gynecology; RR, risk ratio. a Practicing in obstetrics and gynecology. b Adjusted for the proportion of the unknown eligibility who are eligible.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportion of Contraceptive Providers Surveyed, by and Within Specialty, Who Are Skilled Inserters of 1 or More LARC Methods Providers who reported both personally inserting LARC and being “very” or “extremely” confident in insertion of a specific LARC method were classified as “skilled [device] inserters.” Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Abbreviations: IUD=Intrauterine device. LARC=Long-acting reversible contraceptives.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rodriguez MI, Chang R, Thiel de Bocanegra H. The impact of postpartum contraception on reducing preterm birth: findings from California. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):703.e1–703.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ricketts S, Klingler G, Schwalberg R. Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46(3):125–132. doi:10.1363/46e1714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsui AO, McDonald-Mosley R, Burke AE. Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):152–174. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxq012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonfield A, Kost K. Public costs from unintended pregnancies and the role of public insurance programs in paying for pregnancy-related care: national and state estimates for 2010. Guttmacher Institute; https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/public-costs-of-UP-2010.pdf. Published February 2015. Accessed December 1, 2016.
    1. Trussell J, Henry N, Hassan F, Prezioso A, Law A, Filonenko A. Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2013;87(2):154–161. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed