Visual field defects after radiosurgery versus temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Findings of the ROSE trial
- PMID: 30408713
- PMCID: PMC6413861
- DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.10.017
Visual field defects after radiosurgery versus temporal lobectomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Findings of the ROSE trial
Abstract
Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may be an alternative to anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). Visual field defects (VFD) occur in 9-100% of patients following open surgery for MTLE. Postoperative VFD after minimally invasive versus open surgery may differ.
Methods: This prospective trial randomized patients with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis and concordant video-EEG findings to SRS versus ATL. Humphries perimetry was obtained at 24 m after surgery. VFD ratios (VFDR = proportion of missing homonymous hemifield with 0 = no VFD, 0.5 = complete superior quadrantanopsia) quantified VFD. Regressions of VFDR were evaluated against treatment arm and covariates. MRI evaluated effects of volume changes on VFDR. The relationships of VFDR with seizure remission and driving status 3 years after surgery were evaluated.
Results: No patients reported visual changes or had abnormal bedside examinations, but 49 of 54 (91%) of patients experienced VFD on formal perimetry. Neither incidence nor severity of VFDR differed significantly by treatment arm. VFDR severity was not associated with seizure remission or driving status.
Conclusion: The nature of VFD was consistent with lesions of the optic radiations. Effective surgery (defined by seizure remission) of the mesial temporal lobe results in about a 90% incidence of typical VFD regardless of method.
Keywords: Epilepsy surgery; Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy; Partial seizures; Radiosurgery; Randomized controlled trial; Visual field defects; gamma knife.
Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no significant conflicts to report.
Figures


References
-
- Tecoma ES, Laxer KD, Barbaro NM and Plant GT Frequency and characteristics of visual field deficits after surgery for mesial temporal sclerosis. Neurology 1993; 43:1235–1238. - PubMed
-
- Hughes TS, Abou-Khalil B, Lavin PJ, Fakhoury T, Blumenkopf B and Donahue SP Visual field defects after temporal lobe resection: a prospective quantitative analysis. Neurology 1999; 53:167–172. - PubMed
-
- Schmeiser B, Daniel M, Kogias E, Bohringer D, Egger K, Yang S, Foit NA, Schulze-Bonhage A, Steinhoff BJ, Zentner J, Lagreze WA and Gross NJ Visual field defects following different resective procedures for mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2017; 76:39–45. - PubMed
-
- Nilsson D, Malmgren K, Rydenhag B and Frisen L Visual field defects after temporal lobectomy -- comparing methods and analysing resection size. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110:301–307. - PubMed
-
- Mengesha T, Abu-Ata M, Haas KF, Lavin PJ, Sun DA, Konrad PE, Pearson M, Wang L, Song Y and Abou-Khalil BW Visual field defects after selective amygdalohippocampectomy and standard temporal lobectomy. J Neuroophthalmol 2009; 29:208–213. - PubMed