Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 8;18(1):349.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1322-5.

Cultural adaptation and harmonization of four Nordic translations of the revised Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP-R)

Emma Olsson  1   2 , Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson  3 , Sigríður María Atladóttir  4   5 , Anna Axelin  6 , Marsha Campbell-Yeo  7   8 , Mats Eriksson  9 , Guðrún Kristjánsdóttir  4   5 , Emilia Peltonen  6 , Bonnie Stevens  10   11 , Bente Vederhus  12 , Randi Dovland Andersen  13   14
Affiliations

Cultural adaptation and harmonization of four Nordic translations of the revised Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP-R)

Emma Olsson et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants are especially vulnerable to pain. The intensive treatment often necessary for their survival unfortunately includes many painful interventions and procedures. Untreated pain can lead to both short- and long-term negative effects. The challenge of accurately detecting pain has been cited as a major reason for lack of pain management in these non-verbal patients. The Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) is one of the most extensively validated measures for assessing procedural pain in premature infants. A revised version, PIPP-R, was recently published and is reported to be more user-friendly and precise than the original version. The aims of the study were to develop translated versions of the PIPP-R in Finnish, Icelandic, Norwegian, and Swedish languages, and to establish their content validity through a cultural adaptation process using cognitive interviews.

Methods: PIPP-R was translated using the recommendations from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and enhanced with cognitive interviews. The respondent nurse was given a copy of the translated, national version of the measure and used this together with a text describing the infant in the film to assess the pain of an infant in a short film. During the assessment the nurse was asked to verbalize her thought process (thinking aloud) and upon completion the interviewer administered probing questions (verbal probing) from a structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a structured matrix approach.

Results: The systematic approach resulted in translated and culturally adapted versions of PIPP-R in the Finnish, Icelandic, Norwegian and Swedish languages. During the cultural adaptation process several problems were discovered regarding how the respondent understood and utilized the measure. The problems were either measure problems or other problems. Measure problems were solved by a change in the translated versions of the measure, while for other problems different solutions such as education or training were suggested.

Conclusions: This study have resulted in translations of the PIPP-R that have content validity, high degree of clinical utility and displayed beginning equivalence with each other and the original version of the measure.

Keywords: Neonatal; Pain; Pain assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In Sweden and Norway ethical approval was not required for this kind of study, according to the Swedish Ethical Review Act (Lag 2003:460) and the Norwegian Health Research Act of 2008. Data collection was approved by the Data Protection Officials for Research in Haukeland University Hospital (2015/14195) and at Telemark Hospital (45845) in Norway. In Finland, data collection was approved by the hospital administration at Satakunnan keskussairaala (12/2015), Pori In Iceland permission was granted by the Ethical Committee of Administrative Research at Landspitali University Hospital (01/2016) and the Icelandic Data Protection Authority was informed about details on the data collection through a formal report process (S7613/2016). In accordance with national regulations, Norwegian participants gave their written consent to participate. Consent for participation was not required in any of the other countries.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The translation and cultural adaptation process based on Wild et al. 2005 as described in Andersen et al. 2015
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Fitzgerald M. The development of nociceptive circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(7):507–520. doi: 10.1038/nrn1701. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roofthooft DW, Simons SH, Anand KJ, Tibboel D, van Dijk M. Eight years later, are we still hurting newborn infants? Neonatology. 2014;105(3):218–226. doi: 10.1159/000357207. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cruz MD, Fernandes AM, Oliveira CR. Epidemiology of painful procedures performed in neonates: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(4):489–498. doi: 10.1002/ejp.757. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allegaert K, Tibboel D, Naulaers G, Tison D, De Jonge A, Van Dijk M, et al. Systematic evaluation of pain in neonates: effect on the number of intravenous analgesics prescribed. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59(2):87–90. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0585-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hatfield LA, Ely EA. Measurement of acute pain in infants: a review of behavioral and physiological variables. Biol Res Nurs. 2015;17(1):100–111. doi: 10.1177/1099800414531448. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types