Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Nov 8;18(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0189-y.

Pain score, desire for pain treatment and effect on pain satisfaction in the emergency department: a prospective, observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Pain score, desire for pain treatment and effect on pain satisfaction in the emergency department: a prospective, observational study

Judith E van Zanden et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Pain management in the Emergency Department has often been described as inadequate, despite proven benefits of pain treatment protocols. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of our current pain protocol on pain score and patient satisfaction whilst taking the patients' wishes for analgesia into account.

Methods: We conducted a 10-day prospective observational study in the Emergency Department. Demographics, pain characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale pain scores and the desire for analgesics were noted upon arrival at the Emergency Department. A second Numeric Rating Scale pain score and the level of patient satisfaction were noted 75-90 min after receiving analgesics. Student T-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and Kruskall-Wallis tests were used to compare outcomes between patients desiring vs. not desiring analgesics or patients receiving vs. not receiving analgesics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between potential predictors and outcomes.

Results: In this study 334 patients in pain were enrolled, of which 43.7% desired analgesics. Initial pain score was the only significant predictive factor for desiring analgesia, and differed between patients desiring (7.01) and not desiring analgesics (5.14). Patients receiving analgesics (52.1%) had a greater decrease in pain score than patients who did not receive analgesics (2.41 vs. 0.94). Within the group that did not receive analgesics there was no difference in satisfaction score between patients desiring and not desiring analgesics (7.48 vs. 7.54). Patients receiving analgesics expressed a higher satisfaction score than patients not receiving analgesics (8.10 vs. 7.53).

Conclusions: This study pointed out that more than half of the patients in pain entering the Emergency Department did not desire analgesics. In patients receiving analgesics, our pain protocol has shown to adequately treat pain, leading to a higher satisfaction for emergency health-care at discharge. This study emphasizes the importance of questioning pain score and desire for analgesics to prevent incorrect conclusions of inadequate pain management, as described in previous studies.

Keywords: Emergency department; Numeric rating scale; Oligoanalgesia; Pain management; Pain satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients gave written informed consent for participation in the study which was approved by the institutional review board of the UMCG.

Consent for publication

Not applicable, since data was used anonymously.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The University Medical Center Groningen pain protocol
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consort diagram of patient disposition through the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patient satisfaction scores

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tanabe P, Buschmann M. A prospective study of ED pain management practices and the patient’s perspective. J Emergency Nursing. 1999;25(3):171–177. doi: 10.1016/S0099-1767(99)70200-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marks RM, Sachar EJ. Undertreatment of medical inpatients with narcotic analgesics. Ann Intern Med. 1973;78(2):173–181. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-78-2-173. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stephan F-P, Nickel CH, Martin JS, Grether D, Delport-Lehnen K, Bingisser R. Pain in the emergency department: adherence to an implemented treatment protocol. Swiss Med Wkly. 2010;140(23–24):341–347. - PubMed
    1. Wilson JE, Pendleton JM. Oligoanalgesia in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1989;7(6):620–623. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(89)90286-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Selbst SM, Clark M. Analgesic use in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(9):1010–1013. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82565-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types