Resection versus preservation of the middle turbinate in surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 30409178
- PMCID: PMC6225688
- DOI: 10.1186/s40463-018-0313-8
Resection versus preservation of the middle turbinate in surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects up to 16% of the population. When medical treatment fails, endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is considered. The value of resecting the middle turbinate to optimize surgical outcomes has been hypothesized but remains controversial and unproven. Whether the middle turbinate should be left in place or resected is controversial. Our objective is to determine if middle turbinectomy improves objective surgical outcomes after ESS.
Methods: Sixteen patients (15 men, 15 primary surgery) undergoing bilateral complete ESS for CRS with nasal polyposis were recruited. Nasal cavities were randomized so that middle turbinectomy was performed on one side while the middle turbinate was preserved on the other. Each participant acted as their own control. Nasal cavities were compared using Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) and Lund-Kennedy (LKES) scores pre-operatively, and at 1, 3 and 6 months after ESS. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: Pre-operatively, the POSE (12.4 ± 2.9 vs 12.8 ± 2.6, p = 0.33, for the preserved side and the resected side, respectively) and LKES (5.0 ± 1.0 vs 4.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.33) scores were similar between sides. During follow up, resection was associated with more crusting at 1 month following ESS (1.0 ± 0.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.6, p = 0.02). There was a small, but statistically significant, difference between the nasal cavities at 3 months, where the resected side showed better endoscopic appearance (2.0 ± 2.2 vs 3.4 ± 2.8, p = 0.01). No difference was found at 6 months. Frontal sinus scores were similar between sides at 6 months (0.7 ± 0.5 vs 0.7 ± 0.5, p = 1.00).
Conclusion: Our results show no sustained objective endoscopic benefit of routine middle turbinectomy, at least within the first six postoperative months, in patients undergoing primary ESS for CRS with polyposis.
Trial registration: NCT, NCT02855931 . Registered 16 August 2016.
Keywords: Chronic rhinosinusitis; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Middle turbinate; Nasal polyposis.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Approval was obtained by the Comité d’éthique de la recherche en santé chez l’humain du CIUSSS de l’Estrie – CHUS.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Two different therapies for the middle turbinate during endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;277(11):3079-3089. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06184-4. Epub 2020 Jul 11. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 32654022
-
Outcome of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Mymensingh Med J. 2016 Apr;25(2):261-70. Mymensingh Med J. 2016. PMID: 27277358
-
Role of nasal packing in surgical outcome for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis.Laryngoscope. 2014 Jul;124(7):1529-35. doi: 10.1002/lary.24543. Epub 2014 Jan 15. Laryngoscope. 2014. PMID: 24284971 Clinical Trial.
-
Sinonasal debridement versus no debridement for the postoperative care of patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 8;11(11):CD011988. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011988.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30407624 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of SNOT-22 Outcomes after Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Sep;159(3):414-423. doi: 10.1177/0194599818773065. Epub 2018 May 1. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29712509
Cited by
-
Efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide-impregnated Gelfoam nasal pack in management of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps following endoscopic sinus surgery: a perfectly matched, placebo-controlled trial study.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;279(6):2915-2924. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07071-2. Epub 2021 Sep 24. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 34559269 Clinical Trial.
-
Middle Turbinate Resection Versus its Preservation in Patients with Chronic Polypoid Rhinosinusitis Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar;77(3):1209-1214. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05188-4. Epub 2025 Jan 17. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025. PMID: 40093492
-
Creation of a Novel Preoperative Imaging Review Acronym to Aid in Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;167(4):611-619. doi: 10.1177/01945998211053530. Epub 2021 Oct 26. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 34699279 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate resection versus preservation in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a pilot systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 28;87(4):1780-1786. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003036. eCollection 2025 Apr. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40212183 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correlation of Eosinophils and Type 2 Inflammatory Mediators with Osteitis in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.J Inflamm Res. 2024 Jun 22;17:4055-4064. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S466944. eCollection 2024. J Inflamm Res. 2024. PMID: 38939122 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical