Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 9;13(1):16.
doi: 10.1186/s13010-018-0070-3.

What is the place for philosophy within the field of medicine? A review of contemporary issues in medical ethics

Affiliations
Review

What is the place for philosophy within the field of medicine? A review of contemporary issues in medical ethics

Richard Fenton. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. .

Abstract

This extended essay seeks to unpack some of the key aspects of philosophy which are applicable to medical thought and practice. It proceeds via an analytical discussion of the contemporary debate in three key areas of medical ethics: euthanasia, concepts of health & disease and psychiatry.The main claims are as follows: 1. The case for legalising euthanasia is strong on philosophical grounds but there are numerous practical obstacles. 2. Elements from the normative and naturalistic definitions of disease are necessary for a thorough definition that dodges common objections to either. 3. Mental health cannot be subsumed under a purely physicalist model of health rendering it distinctly different from other fields in Medicine. Through a detailed discussion of three salient issues in the philosophy of medicine, it is argued that the application of profound philosophical thought to medicine and its practices reveals a depth that necessitates exploration before simply following the aims of curing all. Philosophical rigour matched with modern medicine has the potential to engage patients and help them make independent, informed decisions and assist physicians to think more clearly, analytically and empathetically.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Honderich T. Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 661.
    1. Geertz C. Anti-anti-relativism. Am Anthropol. 1984;86(2):263–278. doi: 10.1525/aa.1984.86.2.02a00030. - DOI
    1. House of Commons, Assisted Dying (No. 2) Bill, London, UK Government, 11.09.2015, available from: http://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2015/september/commons-private-me...
    1. Shaffer J, Engelhardt H, Spicker S. Evaluation and explanation in the biomedical sciences, first trans-disciplinary symposium on philosophy and Medicine. Galveston, Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company; 1974.
    1. Pellegrino E. Philosophy of medicine: problematic and potential. J Med Philos. 1976;1(1):5–31. doi: 10.1093/jmp/1.1.5. - DOI - PubMed