Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;28(6):657-662.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054575. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

Retailers' perspectives on selling tobacco in a low-income San Francisco neighbourhood after California's $2 tobacco tax increase

Affiliations

Retailers' perspectives on selling tobacco in a low-income San Francisco neighbourhood after California's $2 tobacco tax increase

Gladis Chavez et al. Tob Control. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: California's tobacco tax increased by $2.00 per pack in 2017. Although such increases are among the most effective tobacco control strategies, little is known about their impact from the perspective of corner store owners in low-income neighbourhoods with high concentrations of tobacco outlets.

Methods: We interviewed 38 corner store owners and managers in San Francisco's Tenderloin, the district with the city's highest tobacco outlet density, 60-90 days following implementation of the tax increase. Questions focused on perceptions of the impact of the higher tobacco tax on their revenues, customers and tobacco company promotions. We used qualitative content analysis to identify, compare and reconcile key themes.

Results: Most retailers reported a decline in cigarette sales, with customers buying fewer cigarettes, switching to cheaper brands or other products like marijuana, or trying to quit smoking. Retailers described challenges associated with running a small business and selling tobacco and concerns about selling a product that is 'bad' for customers' health. Contrary to expectation, tobacco companies appeared to be offering few product promotions in this neighbourhood.

Conclusions: Small, independent retailers' concerns, about selling tobacco and about the health and well-being of customers, suggest that such retailers may be important allies in tobacco control efforts,particularly those focused on the point-of-sale.

Keywords: advertising and promotion; price; public policy; taxation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Novotny TE, & Siegel MB California’s Tobacco Control Saga. Health Aff 1996; 15(1), 58–72. - PubMed
    1. Jamal A, King BA, Neff LJ, Whitmill J, Babb SD, Graffunder CM. Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults — United States, 2005–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:1205–1211. - PubMed
    1. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control 2012; 21:2 172–180. - PubMed
    2. Warner KE. Death and taxes: Using the latter to reduce the former. Tobacco Control, 23 (suppl1) (2014), pp. i4–i6. - PubMed
    1. The 2017-18 Budget: An Overview of the Governor’s Proposition 56 Proposals. (n.d.-a). Retrieved August 20, 2018, from https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3573
    1. Smith EA, McDaniel PA, Malone RE. Leadership perceptions of endgame strategies for tobacco control in California. J Public Health Manag Pract, in press. - PubMed

Publication types