Retailers' perspectives on selling tobacco in a low-income San Francisco neighbourhood after California's $2 tobacco tax increase
- PMID: 30409813
- PMCID: PMC7560993
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054575
Retailers' perspectives on selling tobacco in a low-income San Francisco neighbourhood after California's $2 tobacco tax increase
Abstract
Background: California's tobacco tax increased by $2.00 per pack in 2017. Although such increases are among the most effective tobacco control strategies, little is known about their impact from the perspective of corner store owners in low-income neighbourhoods with high concentrations of tobacco outlets.
Methods: We interviewed 38 corner store owners and managers in San Francisco's Tenderloin, the district with the city's highest tobacco outlet density, 60-90 days following implementation of the tax increase. Questions focused on perceptions of the impact of the higher tobacco tax on their revenues, customers and tobacco company promotions. We used qualitative content analysis to identify, compare and reconcile key themes.
Results: Most retailers reported a decline in cigarette sales, with customers buying fewer cigarettes, switching to cheaper brands or other products like marijuana, or trying to quit smoking. Retailers described challenges associated with running a small business and selling tobacco and concerns about selling a product that is 'bad' for customers' health. Contrary to expectation, tobacco companies appeared to be offering few product promotions in this neighbourhood.
Conclusions: Small, independent retailers' concerns, about selling tobacco and about the health and well-being of customers, suggest that such retailers may be important allies in tobacco control efforts,particularly those focused on the point-of-sale.
Keywords: advertising and promotion; price; public policy; taxation.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
"People over profits": retailers who voluntarily ended tobacco sales.PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085751. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24465682 Free PMC article.
-
Exploiting a low tax system: non-tax-induced cigarette price increases in Taiwan 2011-2016.Tob Control. 2019 Dec;28(e2):e126-e132. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054908. Epub 2019 Jun 4. Tob Control. 2019. PMID: 31164488 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of an increase in excise tax on the retail price of tobacco in New Zealand.Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):458-63. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052259. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 26138823
-
Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market.Addiction. 2013 Jul;108(7):1317-26. doi: 10.1111/add.12159. Epub 2013 Apr 16. Addiction. 2013. PMID: 23445255 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of tobacco tax increases and industry pricing on smoking behaviours and inequalities: a mixed-methods study.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Apr. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Apr. PMID: 32271515 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Tobacco company agreements with tobacco retailers for price discounts and prime placement of products and advertising: a scoping review.Tob Control. 2023 Sep;32(5):635-644. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057026. Epub 2022 Jan 24. Tob Control. 2023. PMID: 35074932 Free PMC article.
-
Embracing policy implementation science to ensure translation of evidence to cancer control policy.Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):1972-1979. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab147. Transl Behav Med. 2021. PMID: 34850924 Free PMC article.
-
E-cigarette and cigarette purchasing among young adults before and after implementation of California's tobacco 21 policy.Tob Control. 2021 Mar;30(2):206-211. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055417. Epub 2020 Feb 27. Tob Control. 2021. PMID: 32108084 Free PMC article.
-
Are California's Local Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Effective in Reducing the Retail Availability of Flavored Tobacco Products? A Multicomponent Evaluation.Eval Rev. 2021 Jun-Aug;45(3-4):134-165. doi: 10.1177/0193841X211051873. Epub 2021 Oct 25. Eval Rev. 2021. PMID: 34693773 Free PMC article.
-
Area-level sociodemographic differences in tobacco availability examined with nationwide tobacco product retail licence data in Finland.Tob Control. 2024 Nov 10;33(e2):e158-e164. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057798. Tob Control. 2024. PMID: 37015745 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Novotny TE, & Siegel MB California’s Tobacco Control Saga. Health Aff 1996; 15(1), 58–72. - PubMed
-
- Jamal A, King BA, Neff LJ, Whitmill J, Babb SD, Graffunder CM. Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults — United States, 2005–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:1205–1211. - PubMed
-
- The 2017-18 Budget: An Overview of the Governor’s Proposition 56 Proposals. (n.d.-a). Retrieved August 20, 2018, from https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3573
-
- Smith EA, McDaniel PA, Malone RE. Leadership perceptions of endgame strategies for tobacco control in California. J Public Health Manag Pract, in press. - PubMed