Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 22:7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1681.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15796.1. eCollection 2018.

Multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Affiliations
Review

Multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Lawek Berzenji et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease of the pleura and is largely related to asbestos exposure. Despite recent advancements in technologies and a greater understanding of the disease, the prognosis of MPM remains poor; the median overall survival rate is about 6 to 9 months in untreated patients. The main therapeutic strategies for MPM are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). The two main surgical approaches for MPM are extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), in which the lung is removed en bloc, and pleurectomy/decortication, in which the lung stays in situ. Chemotherapy usually consists of a platinum-based chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, often combined with a folate antimetabolite, such as pemetrexed. More recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a possible therapeutic strategy for MPM. Evidence suggests that single-modality treatments are not an effective therapeutic approach for MPM. Therefore, researchers have started to explore different multimodality treatment approaches, in which often combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and RT are investigated. There is still no definitive answer to the question of which multimodality treatment combinations are most effective in improving the poor prognosis of MPM. Research into the effects of trimodality treatment approaches have found that radical approaches such as EPP and hemithoracic RT post-EPP are less effective than was previously assumed. In general, there are still a great number of unanswered questions and unknown factors regarding the ideal treatment approach for MPM. Hopefully, more research into multimodality therapy will provide insight into which combination of treatment modalities is most effective.

Keywords: Mesotheliomal; Multimodality treatment; Trimodality treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.

References

    1. Bridda A, Padoan I, Mencarelli R, et al. : Peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson BW, Lake RA: Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(15):1591–603. 10.1056/NEJMra050152 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shersher DD, Liptay MJ: Multimodality treatment of pleural mesothelioma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2013;22(2):345–55. - PubMed
    1. Campbell NP, Kindler HL: Update on malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32(1):102–10. 10.1055/s-0031-1272874 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galateau Salle F, Le Stang N, Nicholson AG, et al. : New Insights on Diagnostic Reproducibility of Biphasic Mesotheliomas: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation by the International Mesothelioma Panel From the MESOPATH Reference Center. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(8):1189–203. 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation