Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 31:4:165.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0356-7. eCollection 2018.

Mixed-methods single-arm repeated measures study evaluating the feasibility of a web-based intervention to support family carers of persons with dementia in long-term care facilities

Affiliations

Mixed-methods single-arm repeated measures study evaluating the feasibility of a web-based intervention to support family carers of persons with dementia in long-term care facilities

Wendy Duggleby et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Following institutionalization of a relative with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD), family carers continue to provide care. They must learn to negotiate with staff and navigate the system all of which can affect their mental health. A web-based intervention, My Tools 4 Care-In Care (MT4C-In Care) was developed by the research team to aid carers through the transitions experienced when their relative/friend with ADRD resides in a long-term care (LTC) facility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate MT4C-In Care for feasibility, acceptability, ease of use, and satisfaction, along with its potential to help decrease carer's feelings of grief and improve their hope, general self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life.

Methods: The study was a mixed-methods single-arm repeated measures feasibility study. Participants accessed MT4C-In Care over a 2-month period. Data were collected at baseline and 1 and 2 months. Using a checklist, participants evaluated MT4C-In Care for ease of use, feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. Measures were also used to assess the effectiveness of the MT4C-In Care in improving hope (Herth Hope Index), general self-efficacy (GSES), loss and grief (NDRGEI), and health-related quality of life (SF12v2) of participants. Qualitative data were collected at 2 months and informed quantitative findings.

Results: The majority of the 37 participants were female (65%; 24/37), married (73%; 27/37), and had a mean age of 63.24 years (SD = 11.68). Participants reported that MT4C-In Care was easy to use, feasible, and acceptable. Repeated measures ANOVA identified a statistically significant increase over time in participants hope scores (p = 0.03) and a significant decrease in grief (< 0.001). Although significant differences in mental health were not detected, hope (r = 0.43, p = 0.03) and grief (r = - 0.66, p < 0.001) were significantly related to mental health quality of life.

Conclusion: MT4C-In Care is feasible, acceptable, and easy to use and shows promise to help carers of family members with ADRD residing in LTC increase their hope and decrease their grief. This study provides the foundation for a future pragmatic trial to determine the efficacy of MT4C-In Care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03571165. June 30, 2018 (retrospectively registered).

Keywords: Dementia; Family carers; Grief; Hope; Long-term care; Quality of life; Self-efficacy; Web-based intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A statement on ethical approval can be found on page 19.Not applicableThe authors declare that they have no competing interest.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of participants through the study

References

    1. Prince, M., et al., World Alzheimers Report 2105 The Global Impact of Dementia. Analysis of the prevalanece, incidence, costs & trends. 2015, Alzheimer’s Disease International London, UK.
    1. Papastavrou E, et al. Factors associated with quality of life among family members of patients with dementia in Cyprus. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(3):443–452. doi: 10.1017/S104161021300224X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duggleby, W., D. Schroder, and N. C., Hope and connection: the experience of family caregivers of persons with dementia living in a long term care facility. BMC Geriatr, 2013. 13(112): p. 1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mulin J, Simpson J, Froggatt K. Experiences of spouses with dementia in long term care. Dementia. 2013;12(2):177–191. doi: 10.1177/1471301211418096. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaugler JE, et al. Identifying at-risk dementia caregivers following institutionalization. The nursing home admission-burden and nursing home admission-depression diagnostic tools. J Appl Gerontol. 2012;33(5):624–646. doi: 10.1177/0733464812454008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data