Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;49(4):525-539.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-1014-1.

Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects

Affiliations
Review

Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects

Jules A A C Heuberger et al. Sports Med. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

The World Anti-Doping Agency is responsible for maintaining a Prohibited List that describes the use of substances and methods that are prohibited for athletes. The list currently contains 23 substance classes, and an important reason for the existence of this list is to prevent unfair competition due to pharmacologically enhanced performance. The aim of this review was to give an overview of the available evidence for performance enhancement of these substance classes. We searched the scientific literature through PubMed for studies and reviews evaluating the effects of substance classes on performance. Findings from double-blind, randomized controlled trials were considered as evidence for (the absence of) effects if they were performed in trained subjects measuring relevant performance outcomes. Only 5 of 23 substance classes show evidence of having the ability to enhance actual sports performance, i.e. anabolic agents, β2-agonists, stimulants, glucocorticoids and β-blockers. One additional class, growth hormone, has similar evidence but only in untrained subjects. The observed effects all relate to strength or sprint performance (and accuracy for β-blockers); there are no studies showing positive effects on reliable markers of endurance performance. For 11 classes, no well-designed studies are available, and, for the remaining six classes, there is evidence of an absence of a positive effect. In conclusion, for the majority of substance classes, no convincing evidence for performance enhancement is available, while, for the remaining classes, the evidence is based on a total of only 266 subjects from 11 studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jules Heuberger and Adam Cohen declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Comment in

References

    1. The World Anti-Doping Agency. World anti-doping code 2015. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/prohibited_list_2018_en.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2017.
    1. The World Anti-Doping Agency . Standard prohibited list 2018. Montreal: World Anti-Doping Agency; 2018.
    1. de Hon O. The redundancy of the concept of ‘spirit of sport’ in discussions on the prohibited list of doping substances. Int J Sport Policy Polit. 2017;9(4):667–676.
    1. Momaya A, Fawal M, Estes R. Performance-enhancing substances in sports: a review of the literature. Sports Med. 2015;45(4):517–531. - PubMed
    1. Bird SR, Goebel C, Burke LM, Greaves RF. Doping in sport and exercise: anabolic, ergogenic, health and clinical issues. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53(2):196–221. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources