Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose bone marrow uptake in patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 30412079
- PMCID: PMC6221657
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012859
Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose bone marrow uptake in patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Several studies have reported the prognostic value of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) bone marrow uptake (BMU) measured by F-FDG positron emission tomography (F-FDG PET) in various cancers. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of F-FDG BMU in patients with solid tumors.
Methods: Systematic searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed using the keywords "F-FDG," "bone marrow," and "prognosis." All published human studies of the prognostic value of F-FDG BMU in patients with solid tumors were searched. The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS); both of these were extracted directly from each study. The effects of F-FDG BMU on survival were assessed by using hazard ratios (HRs).
Results: Ten studies with 1197 patients (8 studies reporting EFS in 1096 patients and 7 studies reporting OS in 836 patients) were included. In the EFS analysis, the combined HR was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-2.11, P < .00001) in the random effects model (I = 51%, P = .05). The combined HR of OS was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.13-1.73, P = .002) in the random effects model (I = 52%, P = .05).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis has demonstrated that patients with a low level of F-FDG BMU have better EFS and OS than those with a high level of F-FDG BMU. Based on our results, we suggest that F-FDG BMU could be used as a biomarker for stratifying the risk of tumor progression in patients with solid tumors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
