Spatial avoidance, inhibition of recolonization and population isolation in zebrafish (Danio rerio) caused by copper exposure under a non-forced approach
- PMID: 30414580
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.375
Spatial avoidance, inhibition of recolonization and population isolation in zebrafish (Danio rerio) caused by copper exposure under a non-forced approach
Abstract
Aquatic ecosystems receive run-off and discharges from different sources that lead to the accumulation of contaminants such as copper. Besides producing lethal and sub-lethal effects, copper has shown to be aversive to zebrafish (Danio rerio) by triggering avoidance response. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate how a copper gradient could affect the spatial distribution of D. rerio by triggering avoidance, preventing recolonization and isolating populations. Secondly, to what extent the food availability in a previously avoided environment could make it a less aversive environment was assessed. A non-forced, multi-compartmented exposure system with a copper gradient (0-300 μg·L-1), through which fish could move, was used for the avoidance and recolonization assays. To test the effect of copper on population isolation, two uncontaminated connected zones were separated by a chemical barrier with a copper concentration of 90 μg·L-1 (a concentration producing an avoidance of 50% - AC50). Zebrafish avoided copper and the 2 h-AC50 was 90.8 μg·L-1. The recolonization was in accordance with avoidance and the relationship ACx/RC100-x (RC: recolonization concentration) was around 2.5. When food was provided in the highest copper concentration, the recolonization pattern was altered, although the distribution of the fish was not statistically different from the scenario without food. The chemical barrier formed by copper (90 μg·L-1) impaired the migratory potential of the fish population by 41.3%; when food was provided in the last compartment, no statistically significant trend of fish moving towards that concentration was observed. Copper might act as an environmental disruptor by triggering spatial avoidance, preventing recolonization and isolating populations in zebrafish. The present study allows simultaneously including three ecological concepts to ecotoxicological studies that have received little attention: habitat selection, recolonization and habitat chemical fragmentation.
Keywords: Avoidance; Copper; Food attractiveness; Habitat fragmentation; Non-forced exposure; Recolonization.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Could Contamination Avoidance Be an Endpoint That Protects the Environment? An Overview on How Species Respond to Copper, Glyphosate, and Silver Nanoparticles.Toxics. 2021 Nov 11;9(11):301. doi: 10.3390/toxics9110301. Toxics. 2021. PMID: 34822692 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Might the interspecies interaction between fish and shrimps change the pattern of their avoidance response to contamination?Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Dec 30;186:109757. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109757. Epub 2019 Oct 10. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019. PMID: 31606638
-
Does the previous exposure to copper alter the pattern of avoidance by zebrafish in a copper gradient scenario? Hypothesis of time-delayed avoidance due to pre-acclimation.Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133703. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133703. Epub 2019 Jul 31. Sci Total Environ. 2019. PMID: 31394324
-
Spatial avoidance as a response to contamination by aquatic organisms in nonforced, multicompartmented exposure systems: A complementary approach to the behavioral response.Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Feb;38(2):312-320. doi: 10.1002/etc.4310. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019. PMID: 30444292 Review.
-
Influence of interspecific interactions on avoidance response to contamination.Sci Total Environ. 2018 Nov 15;642:824-831. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.127. Epub 2018 Jun 17. Sci Total Environ. 2018. PMID: 29925054
Cited by
-
Not Only Toxic but Repellent: What Can Organisms' Responses Tell Us about Contamination and What Are the Ecological Consequences When They Flee from an Environment?Toxics. 2020 Dec 12;8(4):118. doi: 10.3390/toxics8040118. Toxics. 2020. PMID: 33322739 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of copper as plant protection product contributes to environmental contamination and resulting impacts on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem functions.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Feb;32(6):2830-2846. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32145-z. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025. PMID: 38324154 Review.
-
Could Contamination Avoidance Be an Endpoint That Protects the Environment? An Overview on How Species Respond to Copper, Glyphosate, and Silver Nanoparticles.Toxics. 2021 Nov 11;9(11):301. doi: 10.3390/toxics9110301. Toxics. 2021. PMID: 34822692 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advancing the Spatiotemporal Dimension of Wildlife-Pollution Interactions.Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2025 Mar 18;12(4):358-370. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00042. eCollection 2025 Apr 8. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2025. PMID: 40224496 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources