Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
- PMID: 30415601
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812851
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Erratum in
-
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 14;380(11):1090. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx190009. Epub 2019 Feb 15. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30767714 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Acute decompensated heart failure accounts for more than 1 million hospitalizations in the United States annually. Whether the initiation of sacubitril-valsartan therapy is safe and effective among patients who are hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure is unknown.
Methods: We enrolled patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure at 129 sites in the United States. After hemodynamic stabilization, patients were randomly assigned to receive sacubitril-valsartan (target dose, 97 mg of sacubitril with 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or enalapril (target dose, 10 mg twice daily). The primary efficacy outcome was the time-averaged proportional change in the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration from baseline through weeks 4 and 8. Key safety outcomes were the rates of worsening renal function, hyperkalemia, symptomatic hypotension, and angioedema.
Results: Of the 881 patients who underwent randomization, 440 were assigned to receive sacubitril-valsartan and 441 to receive enalapril. The time-averaged reduction in the NT-proBNP concentration was significantly greater in the sacubitril-valsartan group than in the enalapril group; the ratio of the geometric mean of values obtained at weeks 4 and 8 to the baseline value was 0.53 in the sacubitril-valsartan group as compared with 0.75 in the enalapril group (percent change, -46.7% vs. -25.3%; ratio of change with sacubitril-valsartan vs. enalapril, 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.81; P<0.001). The greater reduction in the NT-proBNP concentration with sacubitril-valsartan than with enalapril was evident as early as week 1 (ratio of change, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.85). The rates of worsening renal function, hyperkalemia, symptomatic hypotension, and angioedema did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusions: Among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure, the initiation of sacubitril-valsartan therapy led to a greater reduction in the NT-proBNP concentration than enalapril therapy. Rates of worsening renal function, hyperkalemia, symptomatic hypotension, and angioedema did not differ significantly between the two groups. (Funded by Novartis; PIONEER-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02554890 .).
Comment in
-
Safety and efficacy of sacubitril─valsartan in acute heart failure.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019 Jan;16(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0134-5. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30482916 No abstract available.
-
PIONEERing the In-Hospital Initiation of Sacubitril-Valsartan.N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):590-591. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1900139. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30726696 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous