Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):33-44.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809944. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease

JoAnn E Manson et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether supplementation with vitamin D reduces the risk of cancer or cardiovascular disease, and data from randomized trials are limited.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, with a two-by-two factorial design, of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) at a dose of 2000 IU per day and marine n-3 (also called omega-3) fatty acids at a dose of 1 g per day for the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease among men 50 years of age or older and women 55 years of age or older in the United States. Primary end points were invasive cancer of any type and major cardiovascular events (a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes). Secondary end points included site-specific cancers, death from cancer, and additional cardiovascular events. This article reports the results of the comparison of vitamin D with placebo.

Results: A total of 25,871 participants, including 5106 black participants, underwent randomization. Supplementation with vitamin D was not associated with a lower risk of either of the primary end points. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, cancer was diagnosed in 1617 participants (793 in the vitamin D group and 824 in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 1.06; P=0.47). A major cardiovascular event occurred in 805 participants (396 in the vitamin D group and 409 in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.12; P=0.69). In the analyses of secondary end points, the hazard ratios were as follows: for death from cancer (341 deaths), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.02); for breast cancer, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.31); for prostate cancer, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07); for colorectal cancer, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.62); for the expanded composite end point of major cardiovascular events plus coronary revascularization, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.08); for myocardial infarction, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.19); for stroke, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.20); and for death from cardiovascular causes, 1.11 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.40). In the analysis of death from any cause (978 deaths), the hazard ratio was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.12). No excess risks of hypercalcemia or other adverse events were identified.

Conclusions: Supplementation with vitamin D did not result in a lower incidence of invasive cancer or cardiovascular events than placebo. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; VITAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01169259 .).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow Diagram of Enrollment in the Vitamin D Component of the Trial.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Cumulative Incidence Rates of A) Total Invasive Cancer, and B) Major Cardiovascular Events, by Year of Follow-up. From Cox regression models controlling for age, sex, and omega-3 randomization group (intention-to-treat analyses).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Cumulative Incidence Rates of A) Total Invasive Cancer, and B) Major Cardiovascular Events, by Year of Follow-up. From Cox regression models controlling for age, sex, and omega-3 randomization group (intention-to-treat analyses).

Comment in

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. LeFevre ML; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:133–40. - PubMed
    1. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Du M, White E, Giovannucci EL. Trends in dietary supplement use among US adults from 1999–2012. JAMA. 2016;316:1464–1474. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Lee IM, et al. The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): Rationale and design of a large randomized controlled trial of vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acid supplements for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:159–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yin L, Ordonez-Mena JM, Chen T, Schottker B, Arndt V, Brenner H. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum concentration and total cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine. 2013;57:753–64. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data