Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug;12(1):40-45.
doi: 10.15420/ecr.2017:11:2.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Quick Guide

Affiliations
Review

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Quick Guide

Sikorska Julia et al. Eur Cardiol. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, have been the anticoagulants of choice for many years for patients with AF and other thrombotic conditions. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as alternatives represents a major advance in anticoagulation. DOACs have been found to be at least as safe and effective as vitamin K antagonists in randomised, controlled trials for stroke prevention in AF and the management of venous thromboembolism, with real-world data showing similar outcomes. With the availability of several agents, selecting the most appropriate DOAC can be challenging. The aim of the present article is to provide useful guidance on the implementation of DOAC treatment in clinical practice.

Keywords: AF; direct oral anticoagulant; venous thromboembolic event; vitamin K antagonist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: JS has no conflicts of interest to declare. JU has sat on scientific advisory boards for Bayer and Leo Pharma; speaker bureaus for Bayer, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Octapharma, Shire and Portola; clinical trials for Portola, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Baxalta; and received travel support from Bayer, Baxter and Pfizer.

References

    1. Barnes GD, Ageno W, Ansell J, Kaatz S. Recommendation on the nomenclature for oral anticoagulants: communications from the SSC of the ISTH: reply. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13((11)):2132–3. doi: 10.1111/jth.13136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Brueckmann M et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 2013;369((13)):1206–14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361((12)):1139–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romanelli RJ, Nolting L, Dolginsky M et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin for atrial fibrillation in real-world clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9((2)):126–34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002369. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2015;131((2)):157–64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012061. - DOI - PubMed