Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 17:2018:9128527.
doi: 10.1155/2018/9128527. eCollection 2018.

Tumor Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network

Affiliations

Tumor Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network

Qiaoliang Li et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the application of a deep learning architecture, based on the convolutional neural network (CNN) technique, to perform automatic tumor segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 87 MRI containing tumor regions were acquired from newly diagnosed NPC patients. These 87 MRI were augmented to >60,000 images. The proposed CNN network is composed of two phases: feature representation and scores map reconstruction. We designed a stepwise scheme to train our CNN network. To evaluate the performance of our method, we used case-by-case leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The ground truth of tumor contouring was acquired by the consensus of two experienced radiologists.

Results: The mean values of dice similarity coefficient, percent match, and their corresponding ratio with our method were 0.89±0.05, 0.90±0.04, and 0.84±0.06, respectively, all of which were better than reported values in the similar studies.

Conclusions: We successfully established a segmentation method for NPC based on deep learning in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Further clinical trials with dedicated algorithms are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The schematic diagram of the proposed convolutional neural network (CNN) structure. The proposed CNN network includes two phases of feature representation and scores map reconstruction. The feature representation phase consists of 2 Pool-Conv-ReLu blocks and 3 Con-ReLu blocks, while the scores map reconstruction phase consists of 2 deconv-concat-conv blocks. The output of each layer is a three-dimensional matrix with size of h×w×d, where h and w are the length and width of the scores map, respectively, and d is the feature dimension. a×a indicates the matrix size of the convolution kernels. Conv: convolution, Relu: rectified linear units, Pool: pooling, Deconv: deconvolution.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NPC tumor segmentation with high accuracy using the current deep learning method with convolutional neural network. (a) The original image. (b) Ground truth (white line). (c) Segmentation from our deep learning method result (white line) with the dice similarity coefficient = 0.941, corresponding ratio = 0.915, and percent match = 0.950.
Figure 3
Figure 3
NPC tumor segmentation with less accuracy using the current deep learning method with convolutional neural network. (a) The original image. (b) Ground truth (white line). (c) Segmentation from our deep learning method result (white line) with the dice similarity coefficient = 0.797, corresponding ratio = 0.731, and percent match = 0.937.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A feature map fusion. (a) Scores map acquired in the reconstruction phase and (b) scores map reconstructed from the fused feature maps, indicating that score map reconstruction using fused maps is better than that during reconstruction phase.

References

    1. Hong Kong Cancer Registry. Hospital Authority of Hong Kong. http://www3.ha.org.hk/cancereg/
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. CI5 XI: Cancer incidence in five continents volume XI. http://ci5.iarc.fr/CI5-XI/Default.aspx.
    1. Hua Y.-J., Han F., Lu L.-X., et al. Long-term treatment outcome of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with salvage intensity modulated radiotherapy. European Journal of Cancer. 2012;48(18):3422–3428. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.06.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sumi M., Nakamura T. Extranodal spread in the neck: MRI detection on the basis of pixel-based time-signal intensity curve analysis. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2011;33(4):830–838. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22454. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang B., Wong C.-S., Whitcher B., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for characterising nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters and correlation with tumour stage. European Radiology. 2013;23(6):1495–1502. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2740-7. - DOI - PubMed