Comparison of ethanol yield from pretreated lignocellulo-starch biomass under fed-batch SHF or SSF modes
- PMID: 30417150
- PMCID: PMC6218405
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00885
Comparison of ethanol yield from pretreated lignocellulo-starch biomass under fed-batch SHF or SSF modes
Abstract
The ethanol yields from lignocellulo-starch biomass (peels of sweet potato, elephant foot yam, tannia, greater yam and beet root) by fed-batch separate hydrolysis and fermentation (F-SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (F-SSF) using Saccharomyces cerevisiae were compared. Fed-batch saccharification of steam or dilute sulphuric acid pretreated biomass enhanced the reducing sugar yield which resulted in high RS consumption, volumetric ethanol productivity and ethanol yield during the first 24 h fermentation under F-SHF mode, while continuous production and utilization of reducing sugars occurred up to 72 h in F-SSF. Dilute sulphuric acid pretreated residues under F-SHF gave higher ethanol yield (34-43 g/L) and productivity (274-346 ml/kg dry biomass) than steam pretreatment (27-36 g/L and 223-295 ml/kg respectively), while F-SSF was superior for steam pretreated peels of sweet potato, elephant foot yam and tannia giving ethanol yields from 281 to 302 ml/kg. Glucose and xylose were present in all the hydrolysates with a preponderance of glucose and fermentation resulted in significant reduction in glucose levels in both F-SHF and F-SSF. Higher levels of total soluble phenolics and hydroxymethyl furfural were observed in the hydrolysates from dilute sulphuric acid pretreatment and yeast assimilated/detoxified part of the inhibitors, while only trivial amounts of furfural were present due to the low xylose content in the hydrolysates. Continuous formation led to higher accumulation of inhibitors in F-SSF despite supplementation with the detoxification mix comprising Tween 20, polyethylene glycol and sodium borohydride. F-SHF of dilute sulphuric acid pretreated biomass could be considered as a comparatively advantageous process where only one time feeding of enzyme cocktail and yeast was adopted compared to multiple feeds of enzymes and yeast along with other additives such as detoxification mix or nutrient solution in F-SSF.
Keywords: Biotechnology; Chemical engineering.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Bioethanol production from microwave-assisted acid or alkali-pretreated agricultural residues of cassava using separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF).3 Biotech. 2018 Jan;8(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1095-4. Epub 2018 Jan 13. 3 Biotech. 2018. PMID: 29354380 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for enzyme saving during saccharification of pretreated lignocellulo-starch biomass: effect of enzyme dosage and detoxification chemicals.Heliyon. 2017 Aug 10;3(8):e00384. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00384. eCollection 2017 Aug. Heliyon. 2017. PMID: 28831456 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of SHF and SSF processes from steam-exploded wheat straw for ethanol production by xylose-fermenting and robust glucose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Aug 15;100(6):1122-31. doi: 10.1002/bit.21849. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008. PMID: 18383076
-
Recent advances in production of succinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Feb;98(3):987-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5319-6. Epub 2013 Nov 30. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014. PMID: 24292125 Review.
-
Lignocellulosic ethanol: Technology design and its impact on process efficiency.Biotechnol Adv. 2015 Nov 1;33(6 Pt 2):1091-107. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 6. Biotechnol Adv. 2015. PMID: 25485865 Review.
Cited by
-
Production of Raw Starch-Digesting Amylolytic Preparation in Yarrowia lipolytica and Its Application in Biotechnological Synthesis of Lactic Acid and Ethanol.Microorganisms. 2020 May 12;8(5):717. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8050717. Microorganisms. 2020. PMID: 32408498 Free PMC article.
-
Advancement of biorefinery-derived platform chemicals from macroalgae: a perspective for bioethanol and lactic acid.Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2022 Mar 17:1-37. doi: 10.1007/s13399-022-02561-7. Online ahead of print. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2022. PMID: 35316983 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Punica granatum waste to ethanol valorisation employing optimized levels of saccharification and fermentation.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jul;28(7):3710-3719. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.049. Epub 2021 Apr 24. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34220222 Free PMC article.
-
Pomegranate peels waste hydrolyzate optimization by Response Surface Methodology for Bioethanol production.Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Sep;28(9):4867-4875. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.081. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34466060 Free PMC article.
-
Saccharification and co-fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass by a cockroach-gut bacterial symbiont and yeast cocktail for bioethanol production.BMC Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12896-024-00932-8. BMC Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39696229 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alvira P., Tomás-Pejó E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101(13):4851–4861. - PubMed
-
- Anon . Product Information Published by Genencor International, a Division of Danisco, Danisco US Inc; 2009. STARGEN™ 002: Granular Starch Hydrolyzing Enzyme for Ethanol Production.http://www.genencor.com Available from:
-
- Ballesteros M., Oliva J.M., Manzanares P., Negro M.J., Ballesteros I. Ethanol production from paper materials using a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation system in a fed batch basis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009;18:559–561.
-
- Barcelos C.A., Maeda R.N., Betancur G.J.V., Pereira N., Jr. Ethanol production from sorghum grains [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]: evaluation of the enzymatic hydrolysis and the hydrolysate fermentability. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2011;28:597–604.
-
- Börjesson J., Peterson R., Tjerneld F. Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocelluloses by poly (ethylene glycol) addition. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007;40(4):754–762.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases