Distribution pattern and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the water and sediment of Algoa Bay, South Africa
- PMID: 30417256
- PMCID: PMC6702189
- DOI: 10.1007/s10653-018-0213-x
Distribution pattern and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the water and sediment of Algoa Bay, South Africa
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are amongst the pollutants of major concern in the terrestrial and aquatic habitats. They are mostly characterised by carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects. Distribution and potential health risks of sixteen priority PAHs in the water and sediment samples collected between December 2015 and June 2016 from Algoa Bay, South Africa, were evaluated. Water and sediment samples collected were extracted with liquid-liquid and soxhlet extraction methods, respectively, and then cleaned up using glass column loaded with silica gel. Final concentrations of the target PAHs were determined by gas chromatography interfaced with flame ionization detector. Results indicated that individual PAH concentrations in surface water, bottom water and sediment samples ranged from not detected (ND) to 24.66 µg/L, ND to 22.81 µg/L and ND to 5.23 mg/kg correspondingly. Total PAHs concentrations varied as 12.78-78.94 µg/L, 1.20-90.51 µg/L and 1.17-10.47 mg/kg in the three environmental matrices in that order. The non-carcinogenic risk was generally below 1, whereas risk indices (dermal contact) were above the acceptable limit of 1 × 10-4 in the water column, suggesting possible carcinogenic effects to humans, with adults being the most vulnerable. Similarly, highest contributions to TEQs and MEQs in the sediments were made by benzo(a)pyrene and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, the two most toxic congeners, signifying the possibility of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity in humans. Diagnostic ratios of PAHs reflect a prevailing pyrogenic input all through. The pollution was albeit moderate, yet regular check is recommended to ensure safe and healthy environment for human and aquatic lives.
Keywords: Algoa bay; Diagnostic ratios; Human health risk assessment; Marine environment; Mutagenic equivalent; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that no conflict interest.
Figures
References
-
- Aagh H, Rahmanpour S, Abedi E, Arebi I, Mahdinia A. Contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in seawater and sediments of West-Northern coasts of the Persian Gulf. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences. 2016;45(12):1688–1695.
-
- Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MSM. A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. 2016;25:107–123.
-
- Adeniji, A. O., Okoh. O. O., & Okoh, A. I. (2018) Analytical methods for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their global trend of distribution in water and sediment: a review. In: Manar El-Sayed Abdul-Raouf (Eds.), Recent insights in petroleum science and engineering. ISBN 978-953-51-5321-4. 10.5772/intechopen.71163.
-
- AEG (Alliance Environmental Group). (2015). Method 3 Risk Characterization. File No: 5193-01-01, 2015; p. 78. Accessed 20 Dec 2016, https://www.salem.com/sites/salemma/files/uploads/oto_method_3_risk_char....
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
