SEAPI Incontinence Classification System: 1-Year Postoperative Results Following Midurethral Sling Placement
- PMID: 30418297
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000656
SEAPI Incontinence Classification System: 1-Year Postoperative Results Following Midurethral Sling Placement
Abstract
Objective: There are limited long-term data that has examined postoperative quality-of-life measures following placement of midurethral sling (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The SEAPI incontinence questionnaire includes 5 data points that rate severity of specific urinary symptoms. Our aim was to describe changes in SEAPI questionnaire outcomes 1 year following sling placement.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed women who underwent MUS for SUI from 2005 to 2012. We included those women who had completed preoperative and postoperative (>12 months) SEAPI scores. Individual S, E, A, P, I score cure was defined as postoperative score of 0 (>0 preoperative). Logistic regression analysis was used to model the effects of patient characteristics on incontinence cure and S, E, A, P, I scores.
Results: A total of 584 women were included. Median follow-up was 25.4 months (12-126.8 months). Follow-up duration and baseline S, P, and I scores were associated with significantly lower odds of overall incontinence cure, whereas rectocele grade has positive association (odds ratio, 1.31; P = 0.040). Type of sling did not impact overall incontinence cure or cure of individual SEAPI scores.
Conclusions: Preoperative S, P, and I scores had negative association with stress incontinence cure. Cure of individual S, E, A, P, I scores was impacted differently by various patient factors. The SEAPI questionnaire provides a unique profile of patient-reported and functional measures in women with SUI and may be helpful in those who undergo MUS.
Comment in
-
Voiding Function and Dysfunction, Bladder Physiology and Pharmacology, and Female Urology.J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1229-1232. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001622. Epub 2021 Jan 21. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33472394 No abstract available.
References
-
- Minassian VA, Stewart WF, Wood GC. Urinary incontinence in women: variation in prevalence estimates and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(2 pt 1):324–331.
-
- Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, et al. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol 2011;186(2):589–593.
-
- Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008;300(11):1311–1316.
-
- Gomelsky A. Midurethral sling: is there an optimal choice?. Curr Opin Urol 2016;26:295–301.
-
- Raz S, Erickson DR. SEAPI QMM incontinence classification system. Neurourol Urodyn 1992;11:187–199.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
