Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;46(3):159-164.
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000941.

Text Messaging After HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening: Do Patients' Profiles Matter?

Pénélope Troude, Christophe Segouin, Christelle Duteil, Marc Shelly  1 , Elise de La Rochebrochard
Affiliations

Text Messaging After HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening: Do Patients' Profiles Matter?

Pénélope Troude et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Text messaging after sexually transmitted infection (STI)/HIV screening may be a cost-effective means of improving patient care, but it may not be appropriate for all patients. This study aimed to explore the profiles of patients who did not participate in a short message service (SMS) program after STI/HIV testing.

Methods: In October 2016, 396 patients in Paris were screened for STI/HIV and were invited to complete an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Patients were offered the possibility of being notified by SMS after testing, 68% accepted (SMS group) and 32% did not (no-SMS group). Each of the 100 patients from the no-SMS group who had completed the questionnaire was matched with the next patient from the SMS group. Factors associated with nonparticipation in the SMS program were studied using conditional logistic regression models.

Results: Participation in the SMS program was not related to STI screening characteristics (screening results and seriousness of the diseases screened) but seemed to be related to patient characteristics. In multivariate analysis, compared with patients in the SMS group, those in the no-SMS group were more often older, socially less favored (born in Africa or Asia, no university diploma, living outside Paris). They also more often declined to answer sexual questions, which could reflect a need for privacy and discretion.

Conclusions: Although SMS after STI/HIV screening is well accepted, it does not suit all patients. Several contact options should be proposed to comply with patients' preferences and to reduce the risk of nondelivery of STI screening results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: None declared.

References

    1. Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T. Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiol Rev 2010; 32:56–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall AK, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health 2015; 36:393–415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitra S, Globerman J. Delivering HIV/STI test results over the phone and through text messaging. Rapid Responses Service - Ontario HIV Treatment Networks 2016; 1–5.
    1. Tripathi A, Duffus WA, Kissinger P, et al. Delivering laboratory results by text message and e-mail: a survey of factors associated with conceptual acceptability among STD clinic attendees. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18:500–506. - PubMed
    1. L'Engle KL, Mangone ER, Parcesepe AM, et al. Mobile Phone Interventions for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2016; 138:pii: e20160884. - PubMed

MeSH terms