Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 15;13(2):149-153.
doi: 10.5009/gnl18229.

Current Definition of and Controversial Issues Regarding Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas

Affiliations
Review

Current Definition of and Controversial Issues Regarding Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas

Giovanni Marchegiani et al. Gut Liver. .

Abstract

The International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) made the first attempt to standardize the outcome measure of fistulas in the field of pancreatic surgery by publishing the definition and classification of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) in 2005. POPFs were determined by any measurable volume of fluid output via an operatively placed drain with amylase activity greater than three times the upper normal serum value. Taking into account more than 10 years of reported experience worldwide, the updated definition published in 2016 by the reconvened International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) attempted to overcome the limits of the previous classification. The crucial concept of POPF clinical significance was introduced by eliminating grade A from the fistula scenario. The wider use of interventional procedures has also made it necessary to recode grade C POPFs, which now have clearer boundaries, toward the worst end of the severity scale. Grade B still represents the most prevalent and heterogeneous category of POPFs, both in terms of clinical burden and management. In the near future, further efforts will be required to better stratify grade B POPFs to standardize treatment strategies and compare outcomes among institutions.

Keywords: Outcome; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

    1. Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection: the importance of definitions. Dig Surg. 2004;21:54–59. doi: 10.1159/000075943. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Müller M, Gloor B, Candinas D, Malinka T. The 100 most-cited articles in visceral surgery: a systematic review. Dig Surg. 2016;33:509–519. doi: 10.1159/000446930. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM., Jr Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg. 2007;245:443–451. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251708.70219.d2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM., Jr Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg. 2008;32:419–428. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9388-5. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms