A perspective from the history of scientific journals
- PMID: 30421947
- DOI: 10.1037/hop0000108
A perspective from the history of scientific journals
Abstract
In their articles for this special issue on digital humanities, Jeremy Burman (2018) and Ivan Flis and Nees Jan van Eck (Flis & van Eck, 2018) examine how psychology journals can be used as sources for large-scale data sets that might illuminate the development of psychology as a research discipline. In my commentary, I seek to situate these two articles in a broader history of scientific publishing and offer further thoughts on the possibilities and pitfalls of data-based methods for the history of scientific publishing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Comment in
-
Digital methods can help you . . . If you're careful, critical, and not historiographically naïve.Hist Psychol. 2018 Nov;21(4):297-301. doi: 10.1037/hop0000112. Hist Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30421946
-
Digital humanities as the historian's Trojan horse: Response to commentary in the special section on digital history.Hist Psychol. 2018 Nov;21(4):380-383. doi: 10.1037/hop0000113. Hist Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30421950
Comment on
-
Framing psychology as a discipline (1950-1999): A large-scale term co-occurrence analysis of scientific literature in psychology.Hist Psychol. 2018 Nov;21(4):334-362. doi: 10.1037/hop0000067. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Hist Psychol. 2018. PMID: 28726441
-
Through the looking-glass: PsycINFO as an historical archive of trends in psychology.Hist Psychol. 2018 Nov;21(4):302-333. doi: 10.1037/hop0000082. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Hist Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29400480
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
