On the importance of monitoring and valuing all forms of biodiversity
- PMID: 30422973
- PMCID: PMC6233914
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000039
On the importance of monitoring and valuing all forms of biodiversity
Abstract
Pauchard et al claim that non-native species should not be granted conservation value, as this could hinder effort to curtail novel introductions. In this response, Schlaepfer counters that the positive contributions of non-native species to biodiversity and conservation must be included to provide a complete and objective snapshot to policy makers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Comment on
-
Do non-native species contribute to biodiversity?PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 17;16(4):e2005568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005568. eCollection 2018 Apr. PLoS Biol. 2018. PMID: 29664943 Free PMC article.
-
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters.PLoS Biol. 2018 Nov 13;16(11):e2006686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686. eCollection 2018 Nov. PLoS Biol. 2018. PMID: 30422976 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Schlaepfer MA. Introduced species are not always the enemy of conservation In: Kareiva P, Marvier M, Silliman B, editors. Effective Conservation Science: Data Not Dogma: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 39–44.
-
- Vellend M. The Biodiversity Conservation Paradox. American Scientist. 2017;March-April:94–101.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources