Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration
- PMID: 30424879
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.049
Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration
Abstract
Objective: To test the ability of the smartphone-based YO Home Sperm Test to accurately and precisely measure motile sperm concentration (MSC) versus the SQA-Vision, an automated laboratory semen analyzer.
Design: MSC compared for the YO device on Galaxy and iPhone smartphones versus the SQA-Vision in a double-blind manner.
Setting: Academic medical center.
Patient(s): Donor semen samples from 24 men in 144 aliquots.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): Accuracy, precision, and agreement assessed between the YO device and the SQA-Vision for MSC results.
Result(s): The YO device demonstrated good correlation and good to moderate agreement with the SQA-Vision for MSC results up to a range of 94 × 106/mL with Pearson and concordance correlation coefficient above 0.92. The YO also showed a very high level of accuracy (97.8%) with positive and negative percent agreement above 94%. The difference in coefficient of variation between the YO and the SQA-Vision was low (between 9.4% and 11.2%) and not statistically significant. The precision among the YO phone devices was lower (16.0%) than the manufacturer's claim of ≤20%.
Conclusion(s): The smartphone-based device has a high level of accuracy and precision when compared with the SQA-Vision. It can detect samples with abnormally "low" MSC (below 6 × 106/mL cutoff), which supports its use as an effective home sperm test for screening "low" and "moderate/normal" MSC cases. In addition, the device effectively identifies varying levels of normal MSC in a precise manner over a wide range of normal MSC. Thus, the YO Score can improve patient satisfaction and empowerment.
Keywords: Home sperm test; motile sperm concentration; semen quality analyzer; smart phone; sperm.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
A semen analysis phone app does not replace laboratory testing.Fertil Steril. 2018 Dec;110(7):1255-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.007. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 30503115 No abstract available.
-
Re: Home Sperm Testing Device versus Laboratory Sperm Quality Analyzer: Comparison of Motile Sperm Concentration.J Urol. 2019 Oct;202(4):646. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000438. Epub 2019 Sep 6. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31287747 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
